Well…it’s cute, and all…but it’s not funny, or even all that amusing. And yes…it’s the same.
Grade: D
Well…it’s cute, and all…but it’s not funny, or even all that amusing. And yes…it’s the same.
Grade: D
The show seems to have lost one writer…and with him, a lot of humor.
Sort of like ‘The Three Stooges’ without Curly or any decent lines (since these are virtually silent films), when your comedy is highly physical/visual in nature and you lose most of the wit, it becomes simply dull and tedious.
That’s what this is for the most part, and since there are far superior (previous) examples of exactly this (only funny) available, watching this is completely pointless. The end, or a bump in the road?
We can soon find out.
Grade: D-
Not as interesting as ‘Dogs Decoded’, and certainly not nearly as cute.
But it ain’t bad.
Grade: B-
1/17/13: See ‘Pupdate: Documentary Grade Edits’. Grade: C
Yes, it’s the “turkey episode”.
Very cute/amusing, if somewhat overrated.
Highlight: Nativity Scene Dalek.
Grade: B (The last episode worth your time…trust me)
“For me, you’re somewhere between a cockroach and that white
stuff that accumulates at the corner of your mouth when you’re really thirsty.” – Cyrus Grissom
*To a bar of soap* “Now you work with me, and I’ll see that you get put in a tub and nobody uses you.”
This is even better than the last one, which I thought not likely.
But I just can’t call this “excellent”…sight gags are sight gags, no matter how inventive and cleverly done. But it is good…
Necessity is the mother of Mr. Bean’s really bad inventions.
Grade: B+
Very well-made, very well-supported, very interesting, very informative, and very cute.
This settles the “Cats vs. Dogs” intelligence argument pretty well, for those that actually still needed it answered. Unless you consider cats smarter than 2-year-old humans. Most dog-haters I’ve met say they “hate” kids, so I guess that’s a very real/sad possibility.
Or, unless you consider “domestication” in any way related to stupidity. But if you believe that, you probably think that civilized human beings are stupid.
The ability to obey commands is a sign of intelligence, not stupidity.
By the way, I like cats. But to suggest that they’re smarter than dogs is…well, stupid.
Ruff!
Grade: B+
1/17/13: See ‘Pupdate: Documentary Grade Edits’. Grade: B
Didn’t think he had it in him.
But even though I like it, this is probably about as good as this sort of thing gets.
We’ll see.
Grade: B+
Better than the last, which was better than the last. Don’t know how good it can really get, but let’s hope for the best.
Having seen several episodes of ‘Blackadder’, which I’ve never particularly cared for, I now appreciate what a good actor Atkinson is. The in-your-face snobbery is replaced in ‘Mr. Bean’ with a very different, childlike/ish and completely unpretentious character. Granted he doesn’t say much (not to mention not being much of a boyfriend), but his expressions are spot-on (I’m trying to be British).
Actually, I am mostly British in ancestry, but you gather my inference.
Highlight: The truly incredible “magic” show
Grade: B
I should probably explain at this point what exactly this is, for those who don’t know.
It’s a really weird but mostly harmless guy doing really weird things, often to the amusement/horror/astonishment of normal onlookers.
That’s it, is it? Spot on, Chris.
No further explanation necessary, it’d be like trying to explain WHY a joke is funny. You either like this sort of thing or you don’t…I do. To see if YOU do, watch this. It’s a decent example. If you think it’s stupid, you’ll think ALL Mr. Bean is stupid. If not, look at my grades/occasional comments.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Grade: B-
He’s definitely gotten better, and he’s created a lovely little world for himself.
Highlight: department store
Grade: C+
The only really funny bit here is also in ‘Rowan Atkinson Live!’, in a slightly different and slightly better version (along with other bits that are worth watching instead of tolerating this episode’s first two).
Grade: D+
Next logical number in this sequence: 1, 2, 1, X
Next logical word in this sequence: Emptiness, Form, Emptiness, Y
Scroll down for the answers!
A
N
T
I
C
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
X = 2, Y = Form
Conclusion: Life is a circle, not a line.
“You know what? I don’t fcken give a sh1t…(He) shouldn’t be doin that.” – D. Vinyard
Just because it was said by a (then) horrible person doesn’t mean it can’t be used for Good.
-Puppy >.< Yip!
When you dance with Puppy, Puppy don’t change…Puppy changes you.
-Puppy >.< Yip!
“Very bloody.”
“Bloody awful if you ask me!”
Amateurish, silly attempts at drama and social commentary mixed into ULTRA-violence.
Don’t waste your time.
“It’s about the Union Army…”
(Well, what did it say???)
“All Union Soldiers are now wearing Union underwear. THINK of it! Woo woo woo” *runs away*
“My plan is to help the middle class” – Mitt Romney
“Middle income is $200,000 to $250,000” – Mitt Romney
“They expect me to be a “female comic”…” Yeah, funny. Which she is here, kinda.
Hey, she’s gotten a lot better in doing the exact same act…wait, this is six years before.
Am I right or am I right?
Grade: B-
It’s rude and crude. But it’s not worth watching not because of that, but because it’s dull and she sucks up to the audience WAY too much. And the repeat jokes don’t help. Wait for the next roast.
Grade: D-
See ‘Exchange Of The Day’
Lots of good stuff (and only a few boring bits) from Farley, with assists to Phil Hartman and Christina Applegate.
Easily the highlight- Japanese Game Show
Inspirational Quote: “I….’m sorry, I don’t speak Japanese…”
Grade: B
“Oh wow, a neuraly…”
*BLINK*
-Puppy >.< Yip!
Worth watching basically for “Cowbell” (of course) and “Colonel Angus” right at the beginning, maybe the ‘Dead Zone’ parody a little later, and the very ending bit where Walken gives away what everyone always knew or at least suspected. Skip the rest safely.
Inspirational Quote: “Just to be, how you say, douchebag.”
Grade: C+
How do I know that Arizona has a WEREWOLF on their team???
Because Stephens-Howling.
-Puppy >.< Yip!
This is NOT the “first” zombie movie. That being said, it IS the movie without which NONE of the zombie/undead/infected/parody/etc… movies that followed would have been possible. However, that alone doesn’t make it worthy of anything except a high-five and a footnote.
It doesn’t make it worthy of viewing or analysis.
What makes it worthy of viewing/analysis is the fact that even 40+ years after its release, it’s still creepy and interesting, if not quite scary. The script is a bit lacking, it’s a bit cheezy sure, the running woman falls down yeah, and the “FX” and scary soundtrack are horribly dated.
But it’s amazing that it’s STILL a legitimate horror movie today, unlike the vast majority of the 60’s B movies (And this is a B movie, like it or not) that are just dull, boring, stupid, and/or completely irrelevant and worthless except as MST fodder.
The basement scene involving a sharp object is a lot more disturbing/shocking than Hitchcock’s shower scene it obviously draws from. And the ending says more about Humanity than every Romero-wannabe collectively has, ever.
I take back my ‘Survival’ comment…you really did have something(s) to say, George. But you should have stopped at ‘Land’.
Inspirational Quote: “They’re coming to get you, Barbara…”
Grade: B
Lowlights: Some dull moments with obviously uncomfortable sports celebs.
Highlights: Peyton Manning giving back, Stuart Smalley w/ Jordan, spanking Shaq, ‘Sexual Harassment And You’, counterpoint to Jeter, and of course “Little Chocolate Donuts”.
Grade: B
See ‘Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Corpse Vanishes’
Don’t bother. Josh Weinstein’s simultaneously boring and annoying voice make it preferable to watch the horrible movie by itself and do your own riffing if you absolutely must.
Grade: F
From the director who brought you ‘Sorority Babes In The Slimeball Bowl-O-Rama’…
A horror film remarkable for the fact that nothing horrible actually happens.
Well, the first hour is almost-naked men walking around, showering, exercising and lying down with a woman watching them intermittently and taking notes.
At around the hour mark the “plot” begins, then pauses briefly for more showering, then picks up again just in time for the movie to end.
I think I saw some of them drinking Schmitt’s Gay by the pool, too.
Talk about a great time for Shirt-In-A-Can.
I give it a 9.6 on the Das-ometer.
Grade: F-
I was just reading an article about Mars “Blueberries”…the article itself was fairly interesting, but what was even more enjoyable was the “intellectual” debate that took place in the comments section after it. This is where very logical, reasonable, intelligent, well-educated people converse on an adult level.
So…basically one person says something that another disagrees with, and the other person basically says “hogwash” in a very intellectual, snobby way. Then the first person questions, rather politely, WHY they can so easily dismiss it as “hogwash”. (I’m on the first person’s side in this one).
Ok, so then the second person responds in a SLIGHTLY less intellectual/snobby and slightly annoyed/mocking sort of way…and it goes ON and ON and ON…descending to Junior High level.
Basically the first person just wanted to discuss the point, but the second person basically said “No, I won, you’re stupid”. I mean…is this the “advancement” of human interaction? It was like an argument about Red Sox Vs. Yankees at the end, with one person saying “I win I won’t talk anymore *covering my ears* NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH … by the way, I’m a very reasonable scientist.”.
Just as childish as any other arrogant snob claiming “victory”…they really did, I swear…they said – “I’m not talking anymore, I won”. Wow. I thought science was about discovery and friendly interaction for mutual understanding? I didn’t know it was a pissing contest.
Einstein must be rolling over in his grave at the state of some people that consider themselves “intellectual” today.
Here’s a comparable junior-high level framed-as-“intellectual” spat for comparison, courtesy of the Cheers episode ‘Abnormal Psychology’:
*Frasier* So am I to assume that you just naturally thought that I’d be at this drinking establishment?
*Lilith* Actually, knowing your obsessive-compulsiveness, I checked with your service. And indeed you’d left them a very complete itinerary of your day. I trust all went well at the dry cleaners?
*Frasier* Thank you, yes…and, I can assume from your questioning that you’re attempting to make idle conversation rather than articulating some control dysfunction with my personal habits.
*Lilith* That’s correct.
*Norm* Are they “fighting”?
*Lilith* First of all, I think any mention of our past relationship could tarnish the objectivity factor of the show.
*Frasier* You call that a “relationship”? I mean, we dated one time…the closest we came to physical contact was when you closed the car door on my hand.
*Lilith* Are you repressing?
*Frasier* Oh, forgive me, actually, you’re quite right. Yes I should be straightforward in telling you that you are passionless, stoic, and emotionally numb.
*Lilith* Apology accepted.
*Frasier* Merci.
*Woody* Yup, I’m pretty sure they’re fightin, he just asked for mercy.
-Puppy
“A Philadelphia judge on Friday granted a condemned man a rare
hearing to weigh whether prosecutors failed to disclose key
evidence indicating the true motive behind a grisly killing
nearly 30 years ago.
The ruling is a major break for Terry Williams, 46, slated to be
the first prisoner in more than 50 years to be executed in
Pennsylvania while still appealing his sentence. Attorneys for
Williams say his life should be spared due to his traumatic and
violent childhood, and the fact that he was sentenced to die for
killing a man who sexually abused him and other teenage boys.
Judge Teresa Sarmina, of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas,
did not stay Williams’ execution, which is scheduled for Oct. 3,
but allowed a hearing next Thursday that opens the door to that possibility. His attorneys want Williams’ sentence reduced to
life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Williams was sentenced to die for murdering Amos Norwood, 56, a
chemist and church volunteer, whose body was found stabbed,
bludgeoned and partially burned in a Philadelphia cemetery in
June 1984. Police traced Norwood’s stolen credit card to Williams
and Marc Draper, a childhood friend who pleaded guilty to murder
and implicated Williams in the crime.
His arrest and trial shocked the city. A college freshman, Williams
was the star quarterback of his championship high school football
team, and a popular and academically gifted student.
Prosecutors argued at trial that the murder was a robbery that
went wrong. Williams’ attorneys now say the killing was motivated
by rage Williams felt toward Norwood, who Williams said started
paying him for sex when he was 13.
But jurors never heard Williams’ claims that he and Norwood were
involved sexually, or that Norwood was implicated in the sexual
abuse of underage teenage boys in his church congregation. The
jury also did not hear Williams’ claims that he had been sexually victimized by neighborhood men and older teens from early
childhood through adolescence. Williams was three months past
his 18th birthday — the legal cutoff for execution in the U.S. —
when Norwood was killed.
After his arrest in the Norwood murder, Williams was charged and
convicted of third-degree murder for the savage stabbing death of
another man, later identified as a prolific abuser of teens. The
man’s body was found in room scattered with dozens of Polaroid
photographs of nude teenage boys.
State and federal appellate courts found that Williams’ attorney
in the Norwood case was negligent in not presenting evidence of
abuse at trial, but rejected his appeal anyway, ruling that the
negligence did not materially impact the jury’s verdict.
Mamie Norwood, the victim’s widow, has pleaded for clemency for
Williams, but Philadelphia prosecutors are pushing hard for his
execution, recently filing a 107-page brief opposing defense
motions for a stay.
The approaching execution has touched a nerve in Pennsylvania,
where several high-profile child sex abuse trials this year have
forced widespread soul-searching over the failure by church
leaders and educators to root out and report sexual predators in
their ranks.
“If any state should know what sexual trauma does to somebody,
it’s Pennsylvania,” said Marc Bookman, executive director of the
Atlantic Center for Capital Representation, an anti-death penalty
group. “And this is the person that gets executed?”
In July, a senior priest with the Catholic Church’s Archdiocese
of Philadelphia was sentenced to three to six years in state
prison after being convicted of allowing a priest known to him as
a sexual predator to maintain extensive contact with children. Judge Sarmina, who ordered the new hearing for Williams, oversaw the trial.
In June, Jerry Sandusky, a former assistant coach at Penn State
University, was convicted of 45 counts of child sexual abuse
over 15 years. Testimony at Sandusky’s trial established that top university officials were repeatedly told of the abuse but did not
report it to police.
Next week’s hearing will feature testimony from Draper, who
pleaded guilty to acting as Williams’ accomplice in the murder of
Norwood and is serving a life sentence without the possibility of
parole. Andrea Foulkes, the Philadelphia assistant district attorney who prosecuted Williams and Draper, also was called to testify.
In sworn declarations to Williams’ defense team, Draper described
the events of Norwood’s murder and said that Philadelphia
prosecutors told him not to discuss sexual involvement between
Williams and the older man.
According to his declarations, the night of the killing, Draper
and Williams were hanging out on a street corner when they were
approached by Norwood in his car. Norwood picked up the two
boys and drove to a nearby cemetery. “Norwood was very
comfortable,” Draper wrote.
At the cemetery, Williams and Norwood went off alone,
presumably to have sex, according to Draper. “After some time
passed, Terry came back to the car and told me to come with
him,” Draper wrote. “Terry was acting crazy. He started yelling
stuff and began hitting Norwood with a tire iron.”
“He was yelling ‘so you like boys, so you like boys’ as he hit
Norwood.”
Draper’s statements about Norwood having sex with Williams were
never disclosed to the defense or at trial, according to Williams’ attorneys. “Neither Ms. Foulkes nor the police wanted to hear
anything about the case having to do with Norwood having sex
with Terry,” Draper said in his statement.
Foulkes, who now works as a federal prosecutor, told the
Philadelphia Enquirer Friday that she could not comment
on the case.
Williams’ defense team also wants to present affidavits indicating
that Norwood propositioned and molested teenage boys he
oversaw as a youth leader at a Philadelphia church.
In February, the Rev. Charles Poindexter, 80, pastor at St. Luke’s
Church in Philadelphia for 33 years, provided a signed statement
for Williams’ defense and an investigator, describing his
suspicions that Norwood was abusing teenage boys in the
congregation. Norwood spent an inordinate amount of time with
the teens, lent them money and let them sleep over at his house,
Poindexter said.
In his statement, Poindexter also said that several years before
Norwood’s death, the mother of a 15-year-old boy told him that
Norwood had fondled her son’s genitals while driving him home
from a church event.
“She also told me that Amos had inappropriately touched a number
of other boys at the church,” Poindexter said in the statement.
“The mother and her son eventually left the church.”
Reached by phone at his home in Virginia, Poindexter denied
making any incriminating statements about Norwood to the
defense team. But the signature at the bottom of the defense
affidavit is identical to the one at the bottom of a police statement
Poindexter gave police in 1984, days after Norwood’s murder.”
– John Rudolf, HuffPost Crime
Advantages over watching a ‘Whose Line’ repeat: Completely new bits, no “hoedown”.
Unfortunately, that’s all. The new bits aren’t all that exciting, the old bits seem a little stale and aren’t any better than any given episode, and with Brad Sherwood as opposed to Ryan Stiles, it’s just not as funny…Colin and Ryan were the two funniest improvers on the show, and they had a great chemistry.
I just don’t see/feel that with Colin and Brad. Besides, Brad was never all that funny.
It’s very “pleasant” and inoffensive, but it’s not worth the time for anyone except hardcore ‘Whose Line’ fans that have memorized every episode.
Grade: D+
Disgustingly funny: Jeff Ross
Funny: Amy Schumer, Gilbert Gottfried, SURPRISE GUEST(Tom Arnold. OOPS)
Surprisingly funny: Carrie Fisher
OK: Katey Sagal, Wayne Brady, Anthony Jeselnik, Seth Green
DULL: Jane Lynch, Ellen Barkin, Roseanne Barr
Grade: B-
It’s sad when the highlight of a once-dismissively-and-easily-proud franchise is a noise made from a Yes song after it’s mentioned after a Yes gag. With Mike Nelson on board, even cruising, it can’t get completely awful. But at this point MST is closer to being riff-material than riff-master.
Should this have gone another season? No.
Inspirational Quote: “The Ugly, The Ugly, and The Ugly”
Grade: D-
Most of the reviews I do are for movies/shows from Netflix streaming.
So, if you have that also, and are flipping through the available choices and keep thinking “What the *Bleep* is that??”, perhaps I can answer that question here.
-Puppy
Joe Castiglione = Class Act.
Thanks for the memories, Joe.
-Puppy
Lots of footage of planes landing, taking off, fly-ing, and re-FUEL-ing.
Inspirational Quote: “Frankenhooker!”
Grade: D
Short: ‘Johnny At The Fair’ – Not as good as ‘A Day At The Fair’, but still good.
Really bad movie that tries to be really serious with really bad actors and a really out-of-place and out-of-his-league wannabe-ringleader.
Really good choice. They don’t waste their chance, either…really good riffing.
Highlights:
The Hole
The Priest Chase
Merritt Stone(?)
Inspirational Quote: “In the hole!”
Grade: A-
9/12/12: I wanna add movies to my A list so bad I can TASTE it… :( Grade: B+
2/15/13: The short pushes it over the edge, and the movie holds up the standard. Grade: A-
“Well I may look like I’m crazy…I sure know right from wrong.” – Led Zeppelin, “Custard Pie”
The best thing you can say about this movie: Well-intentioned.
The best thing you can say about the guest appearances of TV’s Frank and Joel Hodgson: Well-intentioned.
Missing two of its best writers and without Hodgson’s host segments, MST more often than not turns into this: a display of mediocrity, with Mike Nelson either bored or unable to carry so much of the load.
Inspirational Quote: “You know, I’d rather follow the story of the nuns getting home”
Grade: D-
The departure of Frank Conniff, replaced very inadequately by Mary Jo Pehl, is the first major loss in the writing department. I prefered Hodgson over Nelson (slightly), but Joel never did much writing except for the host segments. TV’s Frank did…and Mary Jo is a big downgrade as both an actor and a writer.
So the riffing is more inconsistent than usual, and the host segments aren’t as good.
Inspirational Quote: “Wish in one hand and cr@p in the other and see which piles up first!”
Grade: D
I am He and He is Me and She is We and We are All together.
-Puppy >.< Yip!
Are football fans really a “target” audience for the really bad “Hawaii Five-0” remake?
And if so…why?
And isn’t it kinda sad when they have to do those cool “action” pan-ins on “striking” poses?
And what’s the deal with Lucy Liu-less? <=== that’s a talent joke, not a racial joke.
– Puppy >.< Yip!
What do you get when you cross a mediocre comedian with a mediocre magician?
A really sad comedy act.
Plus the material was a lot funnier (well, a little funnier) when I saw it the first time…about 15 years ago. Don’t waste your time.
Grade: F
My radio station is “Music to wag your tail to”.
This is movie to fall asleep to.
It’s just so well-intentioned that Mike and the bots just don’t seem to have the heart to really tear into it, and let’s face it…that’s what they do. The host segments are below par, too. Still, there’s a good line now and again…and if you’re having trouble sleeping, this may help.
Grade: D-
For die-hard Bond fans and for those who absolutely hate Bond movies, you might want to watch this. It’s really, really bad…it tries to be Bond-ian(?) but it’s just really, really dull and stupid and incoherent. The host segments are good (as usual), the riffing is best in the middle, and if you’re expecting “action”, you’ll either be amazed, amused, or extremely disappointed.
Grade: C+
I do too have a sense of humor regarding religion.
It just has to be…you know…funny.
This is occasionally brilliant and always interesting.
Completely irreverent, in thoroughly bad taste…and, most importantly (see ‘Python, Monty’)…funny.
Highlights: Hell, Wedding Reception, and the Fleur-de-lis
Grade: A-
“New stuff being put out on dasbut.com. Baby rape drawings.” – Das But
Wow…you are one sick fck. And STILL you’re dull.
“how do I make people “follow” me on this thing? Can everybody in the free world see this?” – Das But
By being interesting.
Yes, which is probably why it’s a bad idea to promote child rape, Das.