Ok, I’ve thought about this a lot, and, if anybody cares, I am…
*DRUMROLL*
Ignostic. Or “Einstein-ian Agnostic”, or “Agnostic Atheist”, or “Spinoza’s-God-Theist”, or “Non-Crusading (atheist or theist) Good Guy”, or “Influenced-By-Buddhism-And-Various-Other- Eastern-Forms-Of-Spirituality-As-Well-As-Certain-Aspects-Of-Western-Religions-And-Various-Others-As Well-Guy”, or “Who Cares?”…
“As god means very different things to different people, when the
word is spoken, an ignostic may seek to determine if something like
a child’s definition of a god is meant or if a theologian’s is intended instead. A theistic child’s concept generally has a simple and coherent meaning, based on an anthropomorphic conception of god. Many philosophers and theologians have rejected this conception
of god while affirming belief in another conception of god, including…Baruch Spinoza and Soren Kierkegaard.” – excerpt from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignostic
But then again, who cares? I’m a good person that doesn’t try to shove my belief (OR non-belief, as the case may be) down anyone else’s throat. If EVERYONE did this, theist and atheist, THAT would make things acceptable to both individual freedom of thought/expression (see ‘The 1st Amendment To The United States Constitution’) AND civil non-crusading-jerkiness. Yip!
Will this gain or lose readers? Not sure. Don’t really care, cuz as I’ve said ALL ALONG, I’m not a propagandist. Believe what you believe…don’t let anyone (on ANY side) tell you what you SHOULD believe. Peace.
-Puppy >.< Yip!