“according to Army Secretary John McHugh, the soldier saw a psychologist last month and was given Ambien for a sleeping problem.” – HuffPost Crime citing ‘USA Today’
This is about the man who recently allegedly killed people at Fort Hood.
HOW, exactly, is that a “relevant fact”?
It’s like saying, IN MY OPINION: “…the soldier saw a psychologist last month and was given a drug millions of people use with absolutely no violent side effects”.
Where’s the story, huh???
Oh, right…I forgot…HOW could *I* forget…mental illness = violent fcken psycho. RIGGHHHHT.
Much LATER it goes on to explain how he had, according to someone quoted “behavioral…and mental health issues and was being treated for that”.
AND, according to another quotee he showed: “no sign of any likely violence either to himself or others.”
So…if you take any meds for ANYTHING, or see a psychologist for ANYTHING…like MILLIONS of other Americans…that’s pertinent information if you allegedly commit mass murder?
Of course, what’s NOT news is that the other 24,999,999 people (note: guesstimate for making a point purposes) who have seen a psychologist and take Ambien DON’T allegedly commit mass murder.
Fcken Bullsh1t.
-Puppy >.< Yip!