CA/A Or Not CA/A? YOU Make The Call!

Excerpt from a recent discussion (not about religion…it doesn’t matter what it’s ABOUT, you see):

“…Here I thought it was because of hundreds of thousands of years of evolution driving men to sow their seed with as many partners as possible and women to be as picky as possible during the same age period. I never could have guessed that physiology would lie to me. Thank you for opening my eyes…”

Now, I don’t KNOW this…but I’d say I’m a solid 6.2534422 that this person is a CA/A.

Why?  Because, even while educating, they can’t resist being an insulting, snide a$$hole.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Stained (2010)

A decent unknown NF Streaming movie for a change.

It’s about a woman who is mentally imbalanced, trying to live out the somewhat-normal life she has no doubt struggled to build for herself after a horrific childhood and lots of abuse.  It’s obvious from the start that she is at least somewhat odd/troubled, as she just seems out of place wherever she is; even at the bookstore that she owns.

The only connections that evidently mean anything to her are her books, her cats, her a$$hole ex-bf, and (most of all) her childhood friend and foster sister.  Indeed, these are the only “things” she appears truly comfortable with; the sister especially seems to be vital to her tenuous hold on sanity.

Basically this film is a portrayal of her slow descent, further and further away from her somewhat-ordered and somewhat-normal world, and at the same time the nobility and loyalty of the sister, whose dominant initial nature proves to be necessary and a product of caring, not manipulation or self-gratification.

For quite a while, the lead seems like she’s TRYING as hard as she can to be “normal”, despite obviously losing the battle.  So she evokes sympathy, making it that much more painful when she sinks below a certain point; one beyond sympathy.

The flashbacks and obvious signs of her horrid past, too, evoke sympathy for her.  At least for a while.

The overall mood is dark, foreboding, and disturbing: the music is almost always perfect in reflecting these, as is the acting; which is solid, especially by the lead.

Overall a very dark film, from start to finish – even the lighter parts seem surrounded by lurking shadows.  And it gets better…and more creepy…as it goes along, culminating in the high point of
its effect, which comes a little bit before the ending.

The ending is a disappointment, unfortunately…but til then this is a decent, interesting movie.

Available on Netflix Streaming until 6/15/14.

Grade: C+

7/14/18: The Great Grade Update. Grade: B-

How To Make A French New Wave Film – By Puppy

(linkdead…Frenchmen explaining flying sheep)

1:06-1:13: The moment(s) of inspiration

The inspiration is then transferred to conception, and upon completion appears as:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wESgWiDVBE

Explained simply as follows:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vhc1hWXH5IM  (3:47-4:51)

Really…interesting.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good clips from a great show (housekeeping)

Devil’s Gravestone (2010)

Terrible, pretentious artsy/goth flick.

The intro monologue is actually promising…until the first special effect, which is so bad that it both disappoints and amuses.

Not quite down to the depths of ‘Vampegeddon’, but close.  Turns out it’s bad acting, bad effects, and lots and LOTS of monologue.

00:20:Something – That’s the director fleeing the scene.

Available on Netflix Streaming until 6/15/14.

Inspirational Quote: “Jesus Christ, it’s like a made-for-tv movie in here…”

Grade: F

The Returned (2013)

A zombie flick.  Imagine my surprise.

The theme is actually somewhat promising, as is the opening; which gives a small but convincing backstory about the female lead, and why she thinks/feels/acts the way she does during the film.

A zombie epidemic is survived by humanity, partly due to a vaccine that “returns” zombies to a normal human state.  But it has to be taken every day, and supplies run short…with the inevitable
reactions both by those infected, those affected, and those just plain scared of the whole situation.

So it’s an unusual, non-redundant take, I’ll give it that.

But it’s pretty slow after the beginning until near the end.  I keep watching because I have to, and because it seems like it MIGHT get better at any moment…but it never really does til the ending.

Points of interest: believable loyalty/devotion of the female lead, a few moving/disturbing parts, and some bits near the ending.

But Chris Cornell’s unintended review of ‘The Crossing Guard’ is too often applicable here, as it just doesn’t live up to the promise.

Grade: D+

Errors Of The Human Body (2012)

This is an artsy German flick (In English).

Not horror, not thriller, mostly dull.

Basically it’s a bunch of scientists arguing/intriguing over research and discovery.  With a backstory, and stumbling to the ending.

I suppose if you like artsy you might like this – it’s got lots of different cuts, camera angles, points of view, flashbacks, etc…

But if you’re looking for what it seems to advertise itself as, you’ll be disappointed if not bored.

The acting is decent, I admit, especially bald creepy-guy.  But I never feel drawn in at all…I never FEEL for any of the characters.  It seems as cold and clinical as its setting.

The music is annoying and out of place a lot.

There’s one interesting plot point and a few cool/weird visuals, and a whole lot of mediocre tedium.

Grade: D-

Thoughts While Watching The Stanley Cup Finals – 6/4/14

There’s an ad for a car where the only selling point of it is basically “you can get a little optional mini vacuum with this”.

That’s about as important as Ron Burgundy’s car commercial talking about the wonderful glove compartment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxWAFOVrYKA

10/16/16: Link Disabled. Apparently Ron Burgundy does not like to share. (housekeeping)

Equality WOW…and thank God (For the Equality, That is)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/04/brianne-altice-rape-charges-teacher-sex_n_5445390.html?utm_hp_ref=crime&icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl1|sec3_lnk3%26pLid%3D484197

“Equality: The quality or state of being equal: the quality or state of having the same rights, social status, etc.” – Merriam-Webster.com

I mean, it’s such horsesh1t, the lawyer’s statement.  Here’s an equivalent argument:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIzw6KKZLgA

2:43-3:03

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good clip from a great movie. (housekeeping)

Star Trek Generations (1994)

I like both beginnings: in space and at sea.

And this is a necessary link between old and new, both to announce the definite end of “old” and as a symbol of “unity” to bring fans of each together.

Sounds a bit silly, but it’s true.  And when I say that, I’m including myself in those that are glad it was done this way – with the symbolic handing-over of the torch.

Favorite parts:

– Data’s “emotion chip” insertion and subsequent results.
– Nexus experiences/emotions/discussions.
– Of special amusement: Data’s little song.
– Kirk/Picard interaction

Good transition, good movie.  Good…moving.  At times, at least.

Inspirational Quote: “Humor!  I love it!”

Grade: B

Butcher Boys (2012)

00:10 – Why don’t they look?

Begins with lots of mayhem and extreme character stupidity.

I watched it because I thought it might be a zombie-ish movie.

It’s not.  It’s about some cannibals, but only vaguely.  Mostly it’s about misogyny, bad dialogue, and gratuitous violence.

Both detestable and incredibly stupid.

‘Butcher Boys’ was filmed on location in a vacant slum.

Inspirational Quote: “AHHHHHHH!!!”

Grade: F-

A Necessary Death (2008)

Off Netflix Streaming 6/7/14.

WARNING: SPOILER

WARNING: Not fully viewed.

Ok, so I wrote this huge review for this film after stopping partway through due to moral concerns…and then I found out that it’s not real, as it pretends to be.

It’s people shown filming other people, but they’re all actors.  Subject of fiction: someone wanting to film someone suicidal up to the point of suicide.

So, if you want to discuss the subject of suicide/assisted suicide, the ethics surrounding it, etc…why not just discuss the subject?

Why does ANYONE need to see a group of (fake) people (that is, these people are all acting, to a SCRIPT) go through the obvious moral questions/concerns/dilemmas?

Unless you get off on the dark voyeurism of the whole thing – even though it’s fake – there really is no point, other than to be spurred into thinking about a subject that either a) doesn’t affect you anyway or b) has already occurred to you without prodding.

Note: I stopped when I was unsure if the portrayed-as-real filmmaker interviewed two little girls, one of whom said she wanted to be the subject of the film.  I started again once he revealed he called Social Services.  I stopped again when I realized it was all fake.

I suppose the argument is they had to pretend it was real to evoke real, strong emotions and reactions from viewers.  And it did succeed there.

And I did find myself asking…why WOULD you have watched it if it was real, but NOT continue watching knowing it was fake?

That’s an interesting question.  I can say with certainty that I was rooting for the subject, whoever it may have been, to NOT go through with it.  I was hoping for a realistic (as I thought it was real) story of someone who feels they want to kill themself, but gradually realizes that life (despite how horrible it sometimes can be) is worth living.  I wanted a voyeuristically POSITIVE result, as I believe this to be the case.  Finding out it was fake made it much less interesting…probably because it would require GREAT acting (which I hadn’t seen so far and wasn’t expecting), whereas if it had been REAL, there would be no “acting”…so it would seem real, because it WAS.

So I’m disappointed and a bit frustrated, because it would have been heartwarming to see someone realize that – despite how horrible your life may seem – it’s worth living…to never give up hope.

Grade: D-

6/3/14: Why didn’t I finish this movie, you may ask.  Laziness?  Fear? I just can’t bear to deal with the emotions involved?  No, no, and no.  For anyone that has any experience with extreme depression and/or suicidal ideation, it’s simply not necessary.  Their (and my) real ruminations are infinitely preferable to someone else’s fake ones.

If you have no experience at all with aforementioned subjects, you may find this extremely intriguing.  In that case, up it to a C- from what I saw before stopping, with possibility for a great rise or fall depending on the rest.

For anyone (like me) who has been in such a position and has decided, emphatically, that life IS worth living, and that suicide is NOT an option, it would be redundant at best. 

I’ll take my own genuine realizations and revelations, thank you very much.  Grade: D-

Star Trek III: The Search For Spock (1984)

Without – for the most part – the two best characters from II (Spock and Khan), this is a fairly unremarkable, mediocre necessary link to IV – except maybe the last 10 minutes, which are all that’s needed.  And even then only as a warmup to IV if you want one.

The other cast members have to act more to compensate for no Spock, which isn’t so good as they invariably overreach themselves.

Tribbles good, dog putting up with Klingons bad.

Grade: D

Giving Liberals A Bad Name

‘Teacher Fired After Asking 4th Graders For Dating Advice’ – Title of recent online article

And she’s appealing. She’s also an “actress”, supposedly, I think…sad.
Great PR move. Maybe you’ll actually be in a movie soon.

Her cinematography clock is definitely ticking. Of course if it was a male plenty of people would be screaming bloody murder. But it’s a female, so it’s sort of “laughably naughty but no harm done” to a lot of those same people. I mean, come on…sexism goes both ways.

You know…”equality” contains the word “equal”.

The sign for equal is… =
 
1=1.  1+1=2.

Simple math…you CAN’T GET more basic.  So how do
crusading, science-worshipping Dawkian “intellectuals” miss this?

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Spider-Man (2002)

Wow…12 years ago.  And to me it seems modern.  Guess I’m getting old.

Parts I remember and parts I don’t…but the one thing I kept remembering throughout was that I liked 2 better.

It’s pretty d@mn fun in the beginning, especially Peter Parker discovering his abilities…cute, both lighthearted and serious.

Tobey Maguire is really good as Parker, but to me the only other standout is the gruff yet oddly charming greedy newspaper chief.  That’s not a good thing, since he has maybe 5-10 minutes total screen time.

Dunst and Franco I find decent but not much more, and the one actor I’d expect to like the most – Willem Dafoe – is actually pretty mediocre.  As the “good” side he’s fine, but the Green Goblin side is overacted and is far more annoying than menacing.  And that’s PRETTY annoying.  I’m not a fan of the comics and I don’t have anything else to go on, but I don’t care…even if Dafoe is portraying him EXACTLY as written, then he’s written pretty badly.

Some dramatic parts believable, others cliche/grandiose.

The camerawork is great, but the FX they capture are sometimes impressive/sometimes Ehhhh…

There’s too much sloooo-moooo, and especially near the ending (and at the ending) it becomes more persistently cliche – not innovative, not “felt”, and just plain not enjoyable.

And there’s far too much Basil Exposition for 2.

Off Netflix Streaming…in a few hours.  Or a few +24, if they show it ON the expiration date and not just TIL it.

Inspirational Quote: “With great power, comes great responsibility. Remember that, Pete…remember that.”

Grade: C