Author: Puppy

Semper Puppy

Screamtime (1983)

Not “found” films; “cheezily and laughably stolen” films.

The thieves have pretty bad taste, too.

First: Old puppeteer clings to his puppet obsession, conflicting with British lad and his mum.  Features a couple of extremely unnecessary in-out zooms, “Wayne’s World” style, and a really dumb chase.  Awfully bad.

Second: Quite dull until very close to the end, where a mildly interesting twist fails to save it.  Sadly, the best of the bunch.

Third: Sillier and sillier story about a house with a strange self-defense system based on garden gnomes and blinking lights.

The post-third ending is very short but terrible.

Grade: F

The Haunting Of Helena (2012)

First half: Somewhat creepy, good makeup/fx for most interesting scene: no gore but fairly disturbing (see, it CAN be done!), acting/script seem a BIT wooden at times, fade…

Second half: Decent fx for not-so-key scenes, greater (same) problem with acting/script, somewhat less creepy, disappointing (and bad) ending.

The only part I’d ever want to watch again is the one first-half scene, which comes just before the second half and gives you a bit of false hope.

I mean it’s never AWFUL…but it’s a horror movie that veers towards dull far too often and is never light – a “serious” waste of time.

Grade: D-

“Mind Games” Working On Carey Price

I don’t know about that “shoot high” stuff, but look at this:

“If you look at all the goals that are scored throughout the playoffs, probably 30% of them are tips and 50% of them are screens and the other 10 (%) are just clean shots.”

See? Already, the Bruins are severely hampering his basic math skills.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Don Hertzfeldt – Everything Will Be OK (2006)

Pretentious former-student film turns into bad acid trip turns back into former…with brief moments of deep thought and comedy.

Makes me feel a little better about my life, though.

I have no interest in further chapters, and neither should you.

For an interesting glimpse at animated insanity, try ‘Caldera’ by Evan Viera.

Grade: D-

Gladiator (2000)

Just found on NF streaming.

You’ve probably seen it already, but if you haven’t (or don’t remember) here’s a quick summary:

Roman General Maximus, after a decisive victory in Germania (which opens and is the best part of the movie, IMPO) is condemned to death by the Emperor’s son, who does not react well to being told he will not inherit his father’s position.  Maximus becomes a slave, and then works his way back to Rome, where the inevitable confrontation occurs.  Then there’s lots of drama before it occurs again.

Joaquin Phoenix is very good (and creepy and evil) as the son, but Russell Crowe is the star with a ferocious and emotionally convincing performance as Maximus.

Periods of tedium, periods of mediocrity, periods of moving excitement/epicness.

There are some really interesting/moving visuals – some grand and some tiny – mostly near and at the end.

I think it’s a little too long.

But, overall, a pretty good movie.

Inspirational Quote: “They say no.”

Grade: B-

Stargate (1994)

An amazing archaeological discovery brings James Spader (Indiana Jones without the respect, personality, or ruggedness…or Evie without the charm and quirkiness) and Kurt Russell (a Kurt Russell character – Gruff variant) together to try to make sense and a movie out of it.

Turns out to be a portal, leading to a sci-fi-ish adventure.

I remembered it being somewhat interesting but ponderous, confusing, and ultimately unsatisfying.

Re-viewing: Pretty boring, actually.  Dull and often cliche.  The beginning isn’t too bad, but the farther it goes the worse it gets.

Grade: D-

Frankenstein’s Army (2013)

Phew, thank God…another “found footage” movie.  I was beginning to worry.

Starts off decently actually, as a WWII movie from the perspective of some Russian soldiers.

It builds up decently as well, with some signs of what’s to come.

Finally they run into the monstrous creations, which seem pretty small in number for an army.  But they are rather deadly.

After that it’s grossness, pauses, and intermittent poorly-filmed battles with often-silly monstrosities until a quick plot twist explaining the camera’s “necessity”.

It switches shortly thereafter to gross Dr. Frankenstein disgustingness (he’s not nearly as interesting as ‘Day Of The Dead”s version) as the unbelievable and fairly thin plot stretches to the end.

I admit, it was interesting enough (at least in potential/curiosity) to make me actually WANT to watch ’til Frankenstein appeared.  But after that it was just gross and fairly pointless, with several dialogue mistakes that I don’t believe were intentional, but which I HOPE the director left in because he didn’t care anymore either.

Grade: D

Thoughts While Watching The Bruins – 5/1/14

Just one thought of note I can remember before OT:

I wonder if I’d be better off if I DIDN’T care about sports.

I DO, but since the odds are against my team in any sport any year (parity and luck make it impossible, in my eyes, for any team to ever claim even or better odds…except maybe in basketball) the likely outcome each year is painful, depressing disappointment.

But it’s too fun to watch (playoff hockey, at least) to yield to that “logic”.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Don Hertzfeldt – The Meaning Of Life (2005)

It’s very well made, with good music by an old poof who wrote tunes.

But the actual watching experience is nowhere near as pleasurable as I’d hoped.

It’s mildly interesting – there are some moments of thought-provocation, some moments of beauty, and a few soothing moments after flurries of action.

But too much is just dull or annoying, or both.

Grade: D+

Dog Shot By Cop – “Internal Investigation”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/29/cop-smiles-after-shooting-dog_n_5235504.html?utm_hp_ref=crime&icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl1|sec3_lnk4%26pLid%3D470237

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67lWS_zno6E

0:24-0:36

I mean, come on.  I’m not saying I KNOW anything, but come on…think about it.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Great clip from a great movie. (housekeeping)

Bad Boys (1983)

Hey, it’s Bob Solo.  Better not let him out of the car.

After seeing the opening caption I was ready, and sure enough…spotted at 22 minutes and change.  Recurring, yet.

This is not another ‘1313’ movie, despite the title.  I’ve learned my lesson well.

Watched mainly to test my memory from age 13-14 of it being good; part I remembered best from before: future ‘Shawshank’ guard getting the sh1t beaten out of him.

It’s a very dark movie, mostly prison-type scenes.  It’s also far too long…there’s a lot of dull/mediocre sh1t that should have been trimmed, especially in the second half.  But it holds up decently for the most part.

And yeah, it’s the long version, and yeah, it’s off NF streaming IMMINENTLY.

Grade: C

Pupdate – Television/Short Subject

In case anyone’s wondering, I never review a television/cable/Netflix/etc series (Basically anything with episodes) until that series is over.

Movies are much easier since even if they’re “episodic” they take at least a year or so between “episodes”.  So reviewing them is far easier in terms of relevance.

So if you’re looking for a review of ‘House of Cards’ or ‘The Walking Dead’, you won’t find any here until both series are over, if at all.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Shriek If You Know What I Did Last Friday The 13th (2000)

The opening ‘Scream’ parody is pretty good.

The rest is a mixed bag, with lots of unfunny parodies/jokes and a few other decent ones.

Other Favs: ‘Reservoir Dogs’ slow-walk mock, recurrent driving disaster memories, and a few other ultra-quick bits.

Near the end it gets REALLY dull, unfortunately…you can pretty much turn it off after the last driving flashback.

I reviewed it because it’s off NF streaming SOON, if you care.

Grade: D

Don Hertzfeldt – Lily And Jim (1997)

A He Said/She Said buildup to a blind date between two somewhat insecure people.

Then there’s an animated date, featuring lots of dialogue (some bland, some out of place, some somewhat interesting) and a bunch of revealing and sometimes amusing thought bubbles.

It’s sort of sweet that they both seem to be trying (the guy’s thought bubbles aren’t QUITE as sweet, but he seems decent otherwise) and I found myself hoping for these two stick figure cartoon characters to get together.  Rowr.

Perhaps I’m too close to the subject, but it was a bit sad nearing and at the end and it actually made me feel…hence the grade.  Recommended to anyone socially/romantically inept/confused/depressed/anxious.

Inspirational Quote: “I would love some coffee.”

Grade: B-

Don Hertzfeldt – Genre (1996)

A rabbit is created and put through many wildly varied and conflicting scenarios by the animator.

Basically, think ‘Duck Amuck’ with a rabbit and grossness, and without nearly as much quality.

It moves along quickly and there are moments of inspired weirdness and cuteness, so I’d say go for it if you’re a fan of Don or the Daffy short.

Inspirational Suggestion: “…The Pretentious Student Film?”

Grade: C+

Don Hertzfeldt – Wisdom Teeth (2010)

A lack of wisdom is displayed in a long short consisting basically of one guy pulling an endless stitch out of some other guy’s throat.

At 3:47 something finally happens, and it gets really weird.  And very silly.  And the one truly amusing gross part doesn’t last very long and turns generic-cartoon-gross/boring until the imminent, thankful end.

Grade: D-

Deep Puppy Thoughts (Part 58)

Borrowing from a somewhat-obscure ‘Flying Circus’ sketch…

If you ever find yourself in an argument with someone over something that you are sure you’re right about, and they insist they’re right when they’re completely wrong, AND they refuse to consider your opinion, AND they get really nasty and mean about it, consider this useful conversation ender before turning and calmly walking away:

“What do you know about it? What do you know about getting up at five o’clock in t’morning to fly to Paris, back at the Old Vic for drinks at twelve, sweating the day through press interviews, television interviews and getting back here at ten to wrestle with the problem of a homosexual nymphomaniac drug-addict involved in the ritual murder of a well known Scottish footballer???”

Note Concerning The Last Note

Three things made better by the policy:
1) It’s easier!
2) It makes my brain hurt less
3) It’s more predictable for you, the reader.  You don’t have to go back re-reading old sh1t unless you want to just re-read it…no “searching in case of new material/edits”.  With the exceptions described.

Although 3 is the least important to me (sorry) it IS actually MORE anal than sometimes editing, sometimes not.  It’s a more (not totally, but more) rigid, predictable, “set” way of doing things.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Note Concerning Earlier Entries

Excepting things where I may “experience” the exact same thing more than once and have a different reaction (television, movies, music and the like) I will NOT go back through my entries and edit for “current feeling” or to make it be more persuasive, “look” better, be more properly worded…

I made the entries that I made.  I’m not the same person as I was when I made them…I can’t know my exact frame of mind/reference at the time of any.  Therefore, they exist with flaws and all.

There may be a VERY few exceptions to this, but generally old posts will remain old posts; as they are, left to be read as they are.

So if something I say tomorrow seems at odds with something I said three years ago…take the much older one as a snapshot of how I felt about it THEN, and the new one as how I feel about it NOW.

Also keep in mind that my satire bits don’t ALWAYS have the warning.

Conclusion: If you’ve read a post from three years ago, it’s probably not gonna be any different if you go back and read it again.

Exceptions: VERY, VERY few outside of Music (rare), Television/Short Subject (extremely uncommon), MST3K (extremely uncommon) and Movies/Long Subject (somewhat common, actually…that’s my bread and butter, man!)

-Puppy >.< Yip!

4/22/16: Content slowly and painfully edited to look better, make sad and happy smilies work, and remove/fix bad links.

Chaos Theory – At Work In Daily Life

You’d be surprised (I struggled with whether to say that or not, because YOU might not be surprised, but SOME people would…but I put it anyway, forcing me to type this explanation) at how much chaos theory impacts your life.  Even with my unbelievably simplistic Ian Malcolm-explained level of understanding of the subject, it’s extremely interesting.

Here is an example from a common everyday scenario:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ixeRWrg0yg

Note the EXTREME divergence beginning with a simple statement at 1:51.

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good clip from a great show. (housekeeping)

Pupdate – 4/22/14

For those of you who have enjoyed my bitter, angry, frustrated posts in the past…

Sorry :(

In future Puppy will be kinder and gentler because Puppy cannot tolerate the intense pain he is very frequently forced to live with.  So, in conjunction with his psychiatrist (Yeah, really, I have one!) he shall be taking a prescription medication that (probably and hopefully) rather dulls his pain, anger, and frustration.

The flip side is it will probably dull his wit, energy, (brief moments of) happiness, etc… as well.

But hey…you gotta do what you gotta do.  Hopefully my posts will retain their level of quality. :) <---- content Puppy (That's content as in being content...there isn't a puppy inside my face).

Keith Richards – Marriage Counselor

Aha! Can’t find the video, but I can find the script.

Here are some brilliantly perceptive pieces of advice and encouragement given to Mick Jagger (OLD SNL SKETCH):

“Well, look, you’ll both be nervous. But, then, you remember that
you love each other, you know, and that you trust each other, and
that you’ve had two kids together.”

“It’s hard to describe, really, partly because I’m drunk.”

“I mean, like, you get a warm feeling when you’re at the studio,
and you’ve been working hard all day, and you get a call, and
it’s her. And you ask her, “Who?” You know, because you’re not
sure. You don’t remember. But then, you have a guy that you pay,
who reminds you who everyone is, and he tells you it’s your wife,
your soulmate, your friend-for-life, and it just feels great.”

Contracted (2013)

NF streaming description incorrect.  It should read, IMPO: “After making out while drunk and depressed with some guy, he rapes her”.  Just to prepare those who are expecting a one-night-stand.

It should, IMPO, further read: “He gives her some horrific illness that slowly degenerates her body, life, morality, and sanity – in that order.  Near the end she goes psycho, destroys everyone she cares about, and then is VERY briefly an infected/zombie.  The End.”

I mean, that’s it…and there’s no point.  How is this so unlike ‘Jenifer’, then?  In ‘Jenifer’ there’s a choice.  And it’s fcken scary.  This is just: “you’re fcked, you’re gonna fck over everyone you know, then you’re gonna die.  There’s nothing you can do about it.”  And it’s not scary, just gross.

Basically this tries to appeal to the gross, nasty visuals crowd.  But if you want gross, nasty visuals there are SO many movies out there that are ALL gross, nasty visuals.  So this is pointless.

The acting is decent, so I can’t possibly give this an F.  But I’d really, really like to.

Grade: D-

6/23/18: I had a feeling this was better than I gave it credit for. And I was right, sort of. The female lead is convincing, and the grossness is … interesting. There’s precious little more, but it is interesting if you LIKE gross. Not “tolerate if there’s something more to it-gross”, but LIKE. The nasty-horrible-vicious-little side of me does sometimes. Oh, and there’s a very powerful anti-lesbian message here. Methinks the director doth get rejected too much. Grade: D

Deep Puppy Thoughts (Part 57)

1:30 onward: A still-impressive visual display that relates closely to my current dating life.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHWjlCaIrQo

Oh shut up, I’m not feeling sorry for myself.  That was last week.  Now I’m just grinning/chuckling about how clever I am.  Even if I’m not.  Shrug…if it’s good enough for Billy…

The Brass Teapot (2012)

I really like the intro to this…nice flow of time to the pictures.

And the couple becomes likeable 10 mins in, when the husband shows a good sense of humor and some wit, and the wife shows (I think) faithfulness, cuteness, and obvious (I think) love.

Shortly after that the teapot arrives on scene.

I like the sorta-BDSM scene but that’s probably cuz the wife is hot.

I also like her well-worded vagina defense, which takes place during one of the last really interesting scenes (a mostly-vegan meal clash).

There ends the good portion of the review.  Because unlike how I expected this to go, it turns to (attempts at) humor and absurdity.  The humor is sometimes dark, but more often it’s medium: not light-hearted, but not good enough for dark either.  Luke-warm.

It’s just tedious after a while, the silly quality having destroyed any chance of emotional attachment or taking anything seriously…at least for me.

Eventually things end, probably as you expected them to after a certain point.

Great idea, decent start…WRONG direction.  This should have been a thriller, a creepy morality play.  Not a comedy.  Or it should have been a really funny comedy, which it wasn’t.

Grade: D

French And Saunders – The Making Of The Filming Of The Making Of Titanic (1998)

Ok.  I don’t care about sequence or completeness anymore with F+S…I just wanna review the funny stuff.  So this works for now.

Pretty darn good…consistent and without cr@p filler or big fat ugly nasty disgusting guys.

And hey, I saw the original…good mockery.

Worth a watch.

CORRECTION:  Search for “French And Saunders Titanic”.

French And Saunders – Christmas Special (1988)

How is this different from most episodes?  Ummm…it’s got a Christmas sketch or two.

Actually this is mostly just tolerable…kinda cute, but not funny or even that amusing.

Exceptions:
Jennifer’s chocolate sucking
camel head/instant baby
horrific F+S backup singing
Jennifer’s sensible heroin
Jennifer’s brilliant video idea

Those are like, 2-3 minutes total.  Decide for yourself.

French And Saunders – Episode 12 (Robbie Coltrane, June Whitfield, Lulu)

So, do they add music/dance because they think it’s GOOD?  Or just because they need to pad the…episode?  Cuz I hear love does that.

In any case this is wretched outside of the first part of the rhinoplasty sketch and an INTENSE STARE by a subtle Dawn.  That’s like…3 minutes.

Season Two ENDS here, Thank God.  This is easily their worst.  In future, I think I shall skip bad episodes as I did for other shows.  Still have to watch them though :(

Lowlights:
horrible song and dance number
June Whitfield interaction/shameless promotion
Lulu’s song
really dumb song from boring sketch
yes, ANOTHER boring song
and another…
and another…
and the ending one.

French And Saunders – Episode 11 (Adrian Edmondson, Lenny Henry, The Proclaimers)

This…is…painful, at times.  Skip.

Highlights:
Intro ADVENTURE sketch
pictures of Jennifer’s a$$
cris-py crunchy crust
some of Saunders’ dining franticness

Lowlights:
underground musical number
REALLY bad Elvis sketch
Raw Sex again, and again
boring living room sketch
most of dining room sketch
ending

Amelie (2001)

Quick review/advice: watch the first 35-40 and last 4-5 minutes.  Skip the other 80 or so.

My first impression was: French.  It’s artsy.  Competent but boring.

Then: Gets more clever, I can tell (I think) the messages it’s sending without being hit over the head with them, and I chuckle/smile a bit.  The way she finds a secret compartment is clever, especially after being led in a different direction.  Then it slowly meanders and starts to lose me until…

About 40 minutes in, I’d had enough.  And though I watched the rest of it, I really didn’t care.  It was drudgery and “Yeah, real clever.  Wonderful.  Oh, great…yeah.  How much time is left??”.

To explain, I would say that the clever bits either stopped being clever or COMPLETELY lost my interest because they were leading to dull/dumb things if they led anywhere at all.  The talking to the camera didn’t draw me in…thank God.  I didn’t wanna be in.  It was the same as the rest, no better or worse.  Equivalent, let’s say, for the sticklers, as opposed to equal.

Quite frankly I found Amelie herself more pretentious and weird than interesting.  Weird does NOT equal interesting.  The two are not intrinsically connected, although they certainly converge in many instances.  This, to me, is not one of them.  And despite all of her weirdness, I find her acts of inspiration rather stupid random chaos.

Her signature moves are smiling impishly, and letting others (including the narrator) talk for her.

I mean, I don’t buy it.  I don’t buy it at all.  Not one bit, not after :40:00.

I get the messages…like when she asks her father a deep question and he responds by saying something unrelated and dull, my interpretation is “they’re showing how different they are and how she longs for someone to understand her, etc…”.  I get that.  I just don’t think it’s really any more clever than the next DECENT movie giving messages in exactly the same way.  Without being brilliant.  Just like this.

Parts are just overblown and annoying, because they’re supposed to be brilliant but I know they’re not.  I particularly groaned (not just bored, annoyed) at the artsy-craftsy visuals.

Vastly overrated.  After 40, it’s barely watchable.  And it HURTS.

Grade: D-

French And Saunders – Episode 10 (Ben Elton)

Confusing new intro…kinda interesting.  Solid episode.

Highlights:
Dawn and Jennifer: VERY naughty schoolgirls (a long one)
medieval French and Saunders
mostly silent Italian practice
French WANTING a sandwich…Saunders’ escape route
French and Saunders schoolgirl mocking/semi-fight/Spam reference!
Saunders decking French
flying cat
not-quite-a cat

Lowlights:
Raw Sex number…can’t seem to get rid of them
big fat ugly nasty horrid humping guys…see above

French And Saunders – Episode 9 (Helen Lederer, Kirsty MacColl)

EXCITING new intro!  Kinda cute. Probably the highlight.

Actual show: Pretty poor…skip it.

They do a bunch of parodying, which I hear they do well later in their careers…but in THIS piece of work, they mostly suck.

Highlights:
Dawn’s Latin(?)
shaky microphone
tasteless Ginger Rogers dance number
tasteless fur-wearers parody

Lowlights:
Katherine Hepburn bit (most of it)
musical number
tasteless bodybuilding sketch (except the end)
packing discussion (except near the end)
Farton sisters
Baby Sue singing…blah.
ending cracks

French And Saunders – Episode 8 (Toyah Willcox, Steve O’Donnell)

Not as good as 7, but better than season one.  A bit, a bit.

Highlights:
Dawn’s intro (even better, great)
weather bit
Thumper discussion
impressive bad joke
chambermaids behaving badly
“Because The Night”…finally (I know what I said, but it’s cool)
Saunders the ballerina warming up

Lowlights:
big fat ugly nasty guys (thank God they brought them back)
bad music
issue sketch
Dawn’s foley kick
most of the ballerina sketch
ending (don’t hang around for it)

Dr. Giggles (1992)

“…he looked like a doctor.
He did, actually.
That’s true.
But he wasn’t, unfortunately.”

A lunatic who believes he is a doctor escapes from confinement and carries out his “work”.

He’s pretty creepy and/or campy when he’s not giggling stupidly.

Somewhat better than your typical cr@p horror flick.  And there are a few clever, funny moments amidst all the stupid ones.

Inspirational Quote: “Terminal.”

Grade: D

7/14/18: The Great Grade Update. Grade: D+

Deep Puppy Thoughts (Part 55)

If you, like many I’ve read, admire Doc’s attitude (as portrayed by Val Kilmer below, at least) then please consider this:

“Tsunetomo believed that becoming one with death in one’s
thoughts, even in life, was the highest attainment of purity
and focus. He felt that a resolution to die gives rise to a
higher state of life, infused with beauty and grace beyond
the reach of those concerned with self-preservation.”
– Wikipedia on Yamamoto Tsunetomo

Doc WAS dying, but still, I think there’s a point there.

This Is Confusing!

Is it just me, or do some of the archers at 3:41 look like they’ve never seen a bow and arrow before?

Like, “Hmmmm…how does this thing work?  I guess you put this HERE, and…man I shoulda practiced this.”

(There’s a ‘Gladiator’ clip out there somewhere this fits with)

Their perceived incompetence echoes in eternity.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

4/22/16: And off we go again!

French And Saunders – Episode 7 (Joan Bakewell, Squeeze)

They seem to have come back ready…with MATERIAL, yet. 

Now this is more like it, and like what I remember.

Highlights:
fallen legbones
3 or 4 only options
beautifully coordinated dance(s)
banter
contraceptive confusion
brief musical healing
bits of insane French during musical duo bit
Dawn’s crawling/popping nipple(?)
hippie French/Saunders at the end of the credits

Lowlights:
bad musical number
Raw Sex, when I thought they were gone
most of musical duo bit
the Dawn-punishing machine

Try To Understand

As Buddy Ackerman might ask me:  What do you really want?

Well, this is it.  Written a bit ago.

I use Buddy because I titled this (no joke, no lie):

“What I Really Want”

and just left it there.

–

Company and Cuddling.

No pressure for sex or anything even sexual.

With a female.  Just my preference.

If this sounds like BS to you, ok…

If it sounds stupid to you, ok…

If it sounds nice or sweet or comforting or pleasant…let me know.

–

Only, don’t go letting me know if I don’t know who the hell you are.  I’m lonely, not stupid.

Well, not that stupid.

-Puppy >.<

Why I’m Back On Twitter – By Puppy

As “SemperxPuppy”.  Follow me if you like.

And the reason is: I like getting hits.  I like getting comments.

They’re not hugs or cuddles, but they ain’t bad.

You could call me a shamelessly self-promoting consumer whore…BUT, I’m not selling anything.  I just LIKE those things.  So more accurate would be shamelessly self-promoting attention slut.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

French And Saunders – Episode 6 (Joan Armatrading, Harriet Thorpe)

Yes, thank God, they use the louvre in this episode as well.

Ok…I’d recommend…episode 1.  And MAYBE 5.  And not this one.
 
On to season 2, yay.

Highlights:
Saunders’ intro, especially her unconvincing arms
Dawn’s cute present-pout
Dawn’s persistent interruptions/playful mocks
Dawn REALLY exploring her sexuality

Lowlights:
Esperanto song
many lulls
guest star led astray
“Eye Of The Tiger”
Dawn dancing to cr@ppy music
Joan Armatrading’s song