Category: I Am Puppy Hear Me Degrade

A Strong Argument Against Poetry

Just imagine if this came to be the norm:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAobK3fyGDI

And, as a bonus, an argument against ballet PLUS inspiration for the classic ‘Maximum Overdrive’:

(Monty Python’s Flying Circus, “Killer Cars”)

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good clip from one of the best episodes of a great show. (housekeeping)

Hockey – A Clarification

Just to be clear, I stand by my previous post, but at the same time…

Doesn’t the whole thing seem just a bit fcken silly?

Every team in the NHL pulls dirty/cheap sh1t at one time or another.  This annoying back-and-forth whining nonsense about “Who is worse than Who” is just sad.  I mean, I could post a lengthy list of dirty sh1t Canadiens players have done in the past.  I could probably post a lengthy list for EVERY TEAM (including the Bruins)…so enough with the self-righteous cr@p already.

Every team plays dirty.  Sometimes.  No, your team is not the exception.  Sorry.

Accept…get over…move on.

Oh, to end, a guest prediction for game seven (an encore, like the Canadiens’ opening Deja Vu):

*DING* “Round One!” – Carla Tortelli

Oh, P.S. – The same goes for football, baseball, basketball, and every other sport ever played.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Deep Puppy Thoughts (Part 59)

It’s too bad Cannibal Corpse didn’t put out an album about ‘Ravenous’, then the morons could have dedicated it to another fcken lunatic.  I mean, D@MN…

Simply amazing how many of those that worship the ultra-macabre/evil never do anything remotely macabre/evil in their pathetic little lives.  Pathetic because of the worship, not the lack of action. 

The lack of action just makes them laughable posers rather than influenced scumbags.

This is about how smart they are…the fakes are the ones that run, the “true” follower is the one left with Samuel:

(Linkdead)

Further Site Reading: ‘Gore Film…’, Vampirefreaks, VF, etc…

4/22/16: I have no idea what this is talking about at the end.

Headline: US Airways flight diverted after crew falls ill.

Hmmm…I guess they all had the fish.

It’s a good thing I hate fish (as food), because it’s EXTREMELY dangerous.  Vis:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRmVW1x3hTk

Reading some comments about the article, I realized other people came to the same conclusion.  What does that show?  That I have my fingers on the pulse of the internet.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good clip from a great movie. (housekeeping)

“Mind Games” Working On Carey Price

I don’t know about that “shoot high” stuff, but look at this:

“If you look at all the goals that are scored throughout the playoffs, probably 30% of them are tips and 50% of them are screens and the other 10 (%) are just clean shots.”

See? Already, the Bruins are severely hampering his basic math skills.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Deep Puppy Thoughts (Part 58)

Borrowing from a somewhat-obscure ‘Flying Circus’ sketch…

If you ever find yourself in an argument with someone over something that you are sure you’re right about, and they insist they’re right when they’re completely wrong, AND they refuse to consider your opinion, AND they get really nasty and mean about it, consider this useful conversation ender before turning and calmly walking away:

“What do you know about it? What do you know about getting up at five o’clock in t’morning to fly to Paris, back at the Old Vic for drinks at twelve, sweating the day through press interviews, television interviews and getting back here at ten to wrestle with the problem of a homosexual nymphomaniac drug-addict involved in the ritual murder of a well known Scottish footballer???”

Chaos Theory – At Work In Daily Life

You’d be surprised (I struggled with whether to say that or not, because YOU might not be surprised, but SOME people would…but I put it anyway, forcing me to type this explanation) at how much chaos theory impacts your life.  Even with my unbelievably simplistic Ian Malcolm-explained level of understanding of the subject, it’s extremely interesting.

Here is an example from a common everyday scenario:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ixeRWrg0yg

Note the EXTREME divergence beginning with a simple statement at 1:51.

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good clip from a great show. (housekeeping)

Keith Richards – Marriage Counselor

Aha! Can’t find the video, but I can find the script.

Here are some brilliantly perceptive pieces of advice and encouragement given to Mick Jagger (OLD SNL SKETCH):

“Well, look, you’ll both be nervous. But, then, you remember that
you love each other, you know, and that you trust each other, and
that you’ve had two kids together.”

“It’s hard to describe, really, partly because I’m drunk.”

“I mean, like, you get a warm feeling when you’re at the studio,
and you’ve been working hard all day, and you get a call, and
it’s her. And you ask her, “Who?” You know, because you’re not
sure. You don’t remember. But then, you have a guy that you pay,
who reminds you who everyone is, and he tells you it’s your wife,
your soulmate, your friend-for-life, and it just feels great.”

Deep Puppy Thoughts (Part 57)

1:30 onward: A still-impressive visual display that relates closely to my current dating life.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHWjlCaIrQo

Oh shut up, I’m not feeling sorry for myself.  That was last week.  Now I’m just grinning/chuckling about how clever I am.  Even if I’m not.  Shrug…if it’s good enough for Billy…

This Is Confusing!

Is it just me, or do some of the archers at 3:41 look like they’ve never seen a bow and arrow before?

Like, “Hmmmm…how does this thing work?  I guess you put this HERE, and…man I shoulda practiced this.”

(There’s a ‘Gladiator’ clip out there somewhere this fits with)

Their perceived incompetence echoes in eternity.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

4/22/16: And off we go again!

Why I’m Back On Twitter – By Puppy

As “SemperxPuppy”.  Follow me if you like.

And the reason is: I like getting hits.  I like getting comments.

They’re not hugs or cuddles, but they ain’t bad.

You could call me a shamelessly self-promoting consumer whore…BUT, I’m not selling anything.  I just LIKE those things.  So more accurate would be shamelessly self-promoting attention slut.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

What Might Have Been… (Almost-Pissing Contest With A CA/A)

Ok, so me and this CA/A were gonna get into an insult exchange (mutually consenting to it) but it sorta fizzled out before it happened.  A shame, really…woulda gone something like this.

Not gonna tell you which one I woulda been.

(This is where you imagine Holliday and Ringo)

-Puppy >.< Yip!

6/12/14: New link due to angsty CA/A whining:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGNdnlCbfMs

Fair Use: Criticism – This clip is one of the best parts of ‘Tombstone’.  Also, CA/A’s suck.  Thank you.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Find The Connection, If Any – Have Fun!

Psssssst…. 2:03-2:24

“Aaron’s pro tips: 2. Assume that ignorance is a valid excuse for being a white racist.”

(WAIT A MINUTE! You said “white racist”. Why did you say that?
Since, according to everything you’ve said before, ONLY whites can
be racist. Therefore, to say “white racist” is, by your own
definition, redundant. Unless of course you mean there can be
other types of racists…but that goes against everything you’ve said previously. You SEEM too eloquent to be TOTALLY redundant…Hmmmm…)”
– Excerpt from a previous discussion

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good clip from a very good movie featuring a usually not-very-good actor. (housekeeping)

Bobbing Low’s Guide To Life – Part 13

A few other critical ones:

Stairs: When travelling (within your house) at night, if forced to use stairs in a dwelling where BL is sleeping (Usually about 8:30 EST…gotta get plenty of rest to earn that…ummm…), you must endeavor to avoid making any noise at all.  This may require a significant amount of time, but don’t worry – if you get it wrong and make the tiniest of noises, you’ll be graciously informed the following morning.  Accept this in the spirit of self-improvement, as no human can ever truly please BL, one must simply learn to annoy him as little as possible.  OH…also, do not turn on the light to climb the stairs.  Do it by feel, by memorization.  Because if you succeed, great…you haven’t used up any electricity!  And if you slip and fall and go crashing down the stairs…well, that light woulda woke him up anyway.  Simply remain still and calm, and in the morning someone will pop that bone back into your leg.

Lights: Lights are not to be used.  The ONLY exception is the room you are CURRENTLY in.  And I don’t mean half-in, or almost-in.  You should be ALL THE WAY in the room before turning any light on.  It’s a simple matter.  Lights left on due to BL falling asleep drunk are, of course, exempted.

Booze: You could talk about your problems/feelings(?), or you could just get hammered.

Delivery: If you, you horrible little younger person with your color tv sets and your hula hoops, decide that someone’s slaved-over dinner isn’t GOOD enough for you just because it is a food that would make you literally vomit, and you decide to order food DELIVERED – I mean, what are you, made of money??? *gulp of booze* – there are just a few things you should know.
1) Don’t do it.
2) If not 1, you will be asked every time even if answer is already known: “You’re ordering out?” or somesuch question/phrase.  There is no proper response…simply deal with the shame of having your dreadful deed pointed out.
3) Time spent going from your room to the door is time LIGHTS ARE WASTED…especially that stupid little outdoor one.  So, somehow manage to be waiting at the door when the food arrives.  Don’t ask me, figure it out for yourself.
4) Even though the dog attacks (or tries to attack) every stranger coming to the door, the dog WILL NOT be held against its will.  It is an occupant of the house, just as you are, you filthy degenerate!  So your options are as follows:
Go outside the house, quickly slipping through the door and then closing it behind yourself just in time to stop the charging dog, shiver if it’s winter, pay for the food, open the door, find out it’s been closed (to save on heat) and therefore locked, knock on the door (with a free hand, or your head lightly if none available), face the scorn of the one opening the door, apologize for your impudence, offer some of the food to the guy sitting like a lump on the couch, wander upstairs and eat QUIETLY.
All other options have been discontinued.

Tha End.

Bad Mathematical News For CA/A’s

Ok, so let’s assume that everything you say is right, and everything any religion says is wrong.

IMPO it isn’t/it isn’t/you’re mostly a bunch of conceited wankers, BUT let’s assume those things for this.

How strategically sound is it to pick a fight with an opponent that has MANY times what you have in terms of: money, power, influence, manpower, consolidation…?

It’s like, for example, an independent political candidate that was NOT independently wealthy.

That candidate could have the greatest ideas and be able to magically fix the world (well, not really, but EVEN IF they could)…and they’d still lose.

How do I know this?  HISTORY.  FACT.  You know…the truth.

You might not LIKE it, but it is the truth. 

You’re fcked.  You cannot win.  Your zeal is matched by MANY independents that have gone down to defeat, year after year after year, since the beginnings of this country.

But hey, good luck. HAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA.  Ahem.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Maternal Instinct

Record001

This following a tearful, heart-rending promise that even going there would never happen.

PUPPY EDIT: This will remain here, the latest entry, until it reaches a certain number of hits.  Then, stuff that I’ve been working on during this/that time will be posted.

Thank you for your cooperation.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

3/23/14:  Good enough.

…And The Rest. Phew…Good Thing That’s Over With

“Adam Terman  Aaron, thanks for being one of the 40 trolls a day.”

Personally, I think you should try to get either DOWN to 6.9 a day or UP to 69 a day.

“The fact that you took the time says a lot.”

Not really.  My life’s not particularly exciting, and you guys make great satire fodder.  Not to mention what you do for my hit total.

“But if you got up from your laptop”

Why would I be sitting on my laptop?

“feeling a little more superior”

How can you feel “more” superior?  Superior does not equal large.  So “more” superior is just a dumb statement…but it’s ok, I still love you.  And so does God.

“I guess that’s the goal.”

No, my goal was to provide satirical amusement to my readers, get a few laughs or at least chuckles for myself, and possibly convert someone to NON-crusading Atheism.  Two out of three ain’t bad.

“And googling past posts? Nice, you are a sophisticated troll.”

Using google is a sign of sophistication?  Oh, right, yeah…that’s a dismissive insult masquerading as a compliment.  Well done.
———————————————
Part Two:

“Bella Wilfer-Rokesmith I’m pretty sure he can tell us himself if he wants us to know something. What are you, some kind of groupie wannabe?”

Bella, at the end of this y’all gonna be wearing gold-plated diapers. (?)
QUOTE: “I don’t have the time, the interest, the energy…” – Neil deGrasse Tyson on CA/Aing

“Bella Wilfer-Rokesmith Maybe he will send you an autographed picture after you send him your fictional stories about him.”

Bella, you are a Godsend…

What the fck are you talking about? Ummm…sorry, but:

To/From Some CA/As

You’re a loony. You’re also reported for trolling and spam.

Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam *Wonderful spam, wonderful spam!* spam, spam…

Great lead-in JW, I’ll take it from here.

*Me talking to everyone reading as if JW isn’t here*

“So the people in this group put up with my rampant posting without a single word of complaint to me for over a week.  The group leader actually “LIKE”s at least 3 of them.  Then, suddenly, instead of ASKING for more posts, because they thought they were “winning”, they basically raise the white flag and hide behind “you’re reported!”.  Intellectual Cowards, eh?”

You guys say trolling a lot…can you go back to the logical fallacy obsession?  I think that one was slightly more sophisticated and thus worthy of you.

BUT, as to your FIRST point, I must respond thusly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_Nq3xuHkgE

AND

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmyHup4TpkU    1:19-2:02

-Puppy >.< Yip!

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Both clips are good parts from a great show. (housekeeping)

How You Know You’ve Won Against A CA/A – Opinion Piece by Puppy

Well, it’s simple really.  Just like any other group, their first response to dissidents is to attempt to overpower them/their arguments with sh1t that comes naturally to them.  You know, the basics…the sh1t they’ve said so many times they’ve got it memorized, down cold. 
Like:  “Ok, this person is *insert suspected flaw in belief structure here*.  So let’s go after that…Ok, that’s a number 23A.  Roll it out”.

If that fails, more will join with different but very similar sh1t.  It’s a pack effect…they’re not doing it to educate, they’re doing it because their rep isn’t doing so well (rep: first person spoken to regarding a given subject).  Then the rep shuts the fck up cuz they realize they weren’t good enough, and the real heavy-hitters come in. (I know, I know…sometimes it’s “the closest they have to-“, but still).

Different methods are employed: The “talking to someone else who feels exactly the same as if dissident isn’t even there”.  The purpose of this is to insult said dissident for being “left out” or “ignored” so they will get angsty and say something stupid.  Also, talking to a fellow tends to give you a bit of renewed confidence: “No, I am NOT wrong…”, etc…

If THIS doesn’t work, maybe their ultra-super-high-mucky-muck comes in and slams the door shut with their best outro.  Or maybe they just completely ignore you…but they still know you’re there, so don’t give up hope.  They’re reading every word you type.

Then there’s the optional “send in a rational neutralish guy”…this is where someone talks to dissident with at least SOME degree of respect, in an attempt to shut them up.  May turn swiftly into step one if they sense imminent failure.

THEN…and ONLY then, do they call upon outside powers.  Why?  Because that makes them feel weak…to NEED someone else to defend you from words.  It’s absolutely INFURIATING to a self-styled educated person to feel like they’re LOSING to some random loser on the net. :)

Correction

At least in some cases, repetition is not the key to comedy.  It’s quoting angsty CA/A’s as they bleat about “logical fallacies” and attempt intellectual, “superior” insults.  Because everyone knows if your insult sounds smart, it must be.  And also funny.

Soooo…given recent readings, it would appear my initial statement was imprecise.  Let’s say repetition and/or angsty CA/A’s is the key to comedy.  Preferably both…and they do oblige.

Vis:

Martine Atherton
“not really any insight there, just a bit butthurt.”

Puppy Response: Well, the insight to me is “Even people that are 6.9 sure about something will read a post if it’s the only way to honestly say ‘Sorry, honey, I don’t want to create anymore revolting offspring.'”  Also, when you say “butthurt” do you mean anal sex, painful rectal itch, a good spanking?  Can’t figure out if you have an anal fixation, an anal fixation, or…hmmm.

Oh!

“Joseph Waldman That’s nice. Now run along, Bergoglioite troll.”

Puppy Response: Wow…you really like that word. Google overload.  You need to, IMPO, expand your horizons on the insult front.  I mean, change it up a little, man.

“Don Taylor Jr. So you decided to expend time and energy to use the argument from authority to declare that it’s a waste of time and energy… o_0”

Puppy Response: So you decided to expend time and energy pointing out that I was wasting time and energy using (OMG/OMLG no, I will not repeat your bleated logical fallacy) to declare that something is a waste of time and energy?

4/15/16: “This is gettin monotonous!” – Curly Howard

And finally, just for fun:

“…presents Richard Dawkins at in Des Moines, Iowa…”

Puppy Response: This could have used at in an editor.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Possible Relative Of Lothar – SATIRE…SATIRE…SATIRE

Latham Conger III:  “What’s your point, mouthbreather with an ego?”

Oh, paaaahhhhdon me.  I shall henceforth refer to him as “Latham, of the Shrill People”.

But…how can I analyze this?  He says nothing…it’s purely an insult.  I think he’s just really angsty-pissed, and he’s trying to find out how best to get under my craw.  Well, sorry LotSP, but third-rate demand/insults aren’t quite good enough.

Why do I quote/comment on these weirdos so much?  Doesn’t that make me as redundant as they are?  Well, not really…because since this is satire, I’m not so much responding as I am mocking.  And there are endless variations on a mock.  AND it’s d@mn good for hits!!!

But…let’s try: “What’s your point,” – Now, this makes sense by itself, if he didn’t understand what I was trying to say. 

“mouthbreather with an ego?”

Now this is interesting…he called me a “mouthbreather”, which I admit I had to look up because that’s a fairly rare insult…at least, *I* have never gotten called that before.  So I looked it up, and now I’m less ignorant!  Should I thank him?

And “with an ego?”.  Ummm…everyone has an ego.  You needed to add something to that, LotSP…like “inflated”, or “extreme”, or “Dawkins-esque”.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

The Most Ambivalent CA/A Support I’ve Ever Seen

“Agnostic Atheist Anti-Theist Foundation Sometimes Bill Maher hits the nail on the head. – JC”

Let’s break this down logically.

JC, apparently the (or one of the) head of AAATF, watches a long Bill Maher rant about religion being horrible, I point out how unbelievably redundant Maher is, and that’s the best support JC can respond with?

I mean, that’s approaching Das But territory: “If you go somewhere else, someone besides me…”

Really ummm…emotionally involved.  And intellectually committed.

Because the statement “Sometimes Bill Maher hits the nail on the head” could mean anything.

Sometimes = more than 1 time
Bill Maher = some garden variety CA/A.  Please…stop planting them.
hits the nail on the head = figuratively, of course.  Meaning “gets something right”

So, the real statement being made (since they don’t believe in empathy, reading emotions, tone, context) is “At least 2 times in his life, a CA/A gets something completely right.”

PUPPY NOTE: “Correct” not used for possible further post advancement reasons.

I mean, I know he CAN’T (well…this is NOT strictly logical, so I dunno, but…) mean that, literally.  He can’t mean “Bill Maher has gotten something totally right at least twice in his life”.

Because that would be stupid, not to mention imprecise.  I mean, I’m sure Bill got a few questions right on his 4th grade math exam.

So what he’s REALLY saying is (in my subjective Puppy opinion) either: “I don’t believe anything he says here is right, but I want to support him anyway, so I’ll say something completely ambiguous”.

OR: “I believe some things he says here are right, but not others, and I don’t want to insult a fellow CA/A, so I’ll vaguely support him in a completely non-binding manner.”

OR: “I believe this entire video is absolutely correct and gets everything totally right.”

OR: “I believe Bill Maher gets things totally right sometimes, but I either haven’t watched the video or I’m too lazy to point out a thing in particular, so I’ll just use an ambiguous figure of speech.”

Brilliant!

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Bobbing Low’s Guide To Life – Part 12

Screw it…it’s just a dog.  Save that 5 bucks a month.  That’s at LEAST 2 beers. *SATIRE*

The rest is NOT satire.

“Sent: 9/2/2010 4:23:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Subj: Hi

I just checked again…Bobby switched it to “Energy Saver – Fan”.  I said it should be on “Cool”, because that helps more with humidity.  Bobby … refused to listen to me.  He’s already threatened to kill me, so I didn’t argue with him.  X is your dog, X.  If you want the AC on a certain setting, it should be.  Talk to Bobby.  If he says he won’t do it, talk to X.  If she says she won’t do it, pay the extra 10 bucks a month to cover the cost difference.  At least, that’s what I would do.  Me saying anything is pointless, I would be ignored.”

Answers:
1) Of course it’s real.  Edited only for name purposes. (X’s) and once for subjectivity purposes (removing something (…) that might be construed as subjective)
2) Yes, this is the guy that’s not paid taxes on a LOT of income for a LONG time, as of mid 2011.
3) No, I don’t think I’m being a rat or a snitch.  He threatened to kill me.  Fck him.
4) *shrug* Not a big dog fan, maybe?  Just a possibility (there was a dog trapped in that virtual fcken greenhouse WITHOUT proper ventilation…to save money, of course)
5) Well that’s plannin, isn’t it?  Forethought.  This isn’t even the best of his worst.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

P.S. – A movie quote to the IRS if they haven’t talked to this…person yet.

“Variable, this is Knife: Where the Hell are you???”

Bobbing Low’s Guide To Life – Part 11

How to say goodbye.

If it’s someone you (I can’t say “like”…let’s say “tolerate well” as the high), then give a quick “Bye”, MAYBE EVEN IF they don’t say it first!!! (That’s like, pure BL gold…you gotta really be lucky).

If it’s someone you dislike/hate then either COMPLETELY ignore their attempts, gaze up coldly for DARING to take up your time with a pleasantry and then look back down, OR…and this is the most common and recommended by B.L….PRETEND you didn’t hear them, make them say it again, and THEN do the ignore/cold stare in some sort of variety pack form.  You know, always the same, just mix it up a little.

Sorta like the ‘Today’s Mystery Limp’, only…well, I was gonna say “smarter” or “dumber”, but it’s pretty darn equal.

And while writing about B.L., this just came to mind…not sure HOW it’s connected, but there it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRKz82v5JQY

P.S. I apologize for the redundancy with Part 10, this is just like, SO B.L.  And I’m still only writing ONE copy for every…hmmmmm…let’s say 100 times it happened.  Very conservative estimate, mind you.

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Bad movie, just enjoy the clip. (housekeeping)

How To Respond Decisively To A Request

This is a JOKE…calm the fck down.

The German Response: A strong “No”.

FAIR USE: CRITICISM – I don’t care how historically “inaccurate” it is.

1) It’s a MOVIE.
2) Don’t be so pedantic.
3) Look up the phrase “suspension of disbelief”
4) I hardly think anything that may have in some tiny way happened 2,000 years ago can be PRECISELY DOCUMENTED.
5) What do you have against dogs??? Bastards.
6) I forget six.
6.9) I change my position: it is not completely and precisely accurate, therefore it is illogical and against the Ministry Of Truth. Just don’t throw rats at my face, please, for the love of non-God.

Bobbing Low’s Guide To Life – Part 10

How to greet/say goodbye to people.

If you LIKE them (very rare): Give them an emotionless but polite “hello” but do not otherwise pursue conversation.

If you are APATHETIC/NEUTRAL towards them: Give them some sort of FAINT acknowledgement (perhaps) if you’re in the mood for it.  Otherwise, skip it.

If you DISLIKE them (for no reason other than you’re a prick):  Return their greeting/farewell with COMPLETE ignorance OR (even better) just look up slightly, stare at them coldly, and then look back down.  Best when done several dozen (hundred?) times to reinforce the effect.

Whatever the case may be, try to avoid conversation.  Because then they’ll probably think this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – A good bit from a really bad movie. (housekeeping)

Crimson Tide – The Extended Version (Part 6)

Timing has been abandoned for this bit.

“You know, Mr. Hunter…with the advancements in submarine technology we have in this ship, we could travel very large distances if we wanted to.”
“Yes, I’m aware of that, Sir.”
“I’m not certain of this, Mr. Hunter…but I would bet we could very easily travel, let’s say, 20,000 leagues.”
“Yes, Sir, I concur.”
“That’s pretty deep, Mr. Hunter.”
“Actually, Sir, it’s pretty far.  But it may or may not actually be deep.  Sir.”
“What’s that, Mr. Hunter?”
“I was explaining, Sir, that travelling 20,000 leagues would be pretty far, Sir.  But not necessarily all that deep.  Sir.”
“Ah, yes…I understand that now.  Thank you, Mr.  Hunter.  Oh, by the way, I bet those Portugese horses, the Lippizaner stallions,  could run a distance of 20,000 leagues before they got tired.
“I don’t think you’ve quite got the hang of that measurement, Sir.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4anNb2jS4Q

“I didn’t know that, Mr. Hunter.  But they are from Portugal.”
“Sir, if you don’t mind, could we please drop the friggin’ horse conversation?”

There’s 20,000 leagues more, but I’m done here.

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – A great bit from a great show. It’s a great episode, too, as I recall. (housekeeping)

Lunatics Reviewing Music – Part 13

The vastly overrated Andy Kaufman adding a little punch to “The Mighty Mouse Theme”.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGx94VPb8V8

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – I’m gonna criticize this (it’s mildly amusing) but I don’t care much if you campaign wildly for its removal since the mildly is very mildly. (housekeeping)

Lunatics Reviewing Music – Part 12

SOL’s Legends Of Rock on “The Band That Played California Lady” and their big hit, “California Lady”.  A tragic, insane tale.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8wGJjBax8w

10/16/16: FAIR USE: CRITICISM – This is an entertaining clip from an otherwise somewhat dull MST3K episode, if I recall correctly. (housekeeping)