I Think Not Formatting Or Explaining Makes It More Real

If not, he would be doomed to remain a beast for all time. As the years passed, he fell into despair and lost all hope. For who could ever learn to love a beast?

I let her go.

Cogsworth: Yes, yes, splen – You what? How could you do that?

Beast: I had to.

Cogsworth: Yes, but, but, but but why?

Beast: Because I love her.

We don’t like what we don’t understand, in fact it scares us, and this monster is mysterious at least…

What should we do, Master?

Beast: It doesn’t matter now. Just let them come.

Oh, uh this is a rejection letter.
It’s not a rejection letter per se.
It’s a “soon and inevitably to be accepted” letter.
Listen to this.
“Your work is not entirely without promise.

“Hurricane of Wills,” unfinished.

You win, Sam.
I’ve struggled so hard for so long to keep my dreams alive, and I haven’t fooled anyone but myself.
I know all along you all considered me a pretentious, self-deluded windbag and apparently, you’ve all been right.
I’m never going to be Diane Chambers, the great poet, the world-famous novelist, the revered artist.
I’ve gone as high as I’m going to go.
I’m a waitress in a beer hall and not a very good one.
A waitress.
A waitress.
A waitress.
Miss, could you take our order? (sobbing)

The GOOD Stubborn

“KIRK: It is useless to resist us.
THARN [on viewscreen: We do not resist you.
KIRK: You have twelve hours to consider your position.
THARN [on viewscreen: Twelve years, Captain Kirk, or twelve thousand. We are ethically compelled to deny your demand for our dilithium crystals, for you would use their power to destroy.
KIRK: We will level your planet and take what we want. That is
destruction. You will die as a race.
THARN [on viewscreen: To preserve what we are.”

The limits of scientific testing, no matter the purpose.

(SPOILER ALERT – ENDING)

I think, at least.

As is. If you want to make a connection that doesn’t exist, go right ahead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ1BkH1ucfc

FAIR USE: CRITICISM – This clip serves, in my opinion, as a statement on scientific testing and an emotionally-and-well-put moral objection to such testing, taking all into account. To criticize this scene: This is the best scene of the movie ‘Extreme Measures’, to which I hold no rights and am making no profit from in any way.

Film Imitates Hagakure – Part Fourteen

“…The essentials of speaking are in not speaking at all. If you think that you can finish something without speaking, finish it without saying a single word. If there is something that cannot be accomplished without speaking, one should speak with few words, in a way that will accord well with reason…”

FAIR USE: CRITICISM – A good example (from a great movie) of a man of few words.

Film Imitates Hagakure – Part Thirteen

“…The way of revenge lies in simply forcing one’s way into a place and being cut down. There is no shame in this. By thinking that you must complete the job you will run out of time. By considering things like how many men the enemy has, time piles up; in the end you will give up. No matter if the enemy has thousands of men, there is fulfillment in simply standing them off and being determined to cut them all down, starting from one end. You will finish the greater part of it…”

FAIR USE: CRITICISM – A very powerful clip from the movie ‘Unforgiven’ that is, I think, a good example of the above quote.

Film Imitates Hagakure – Part Twelve

“…There is something to be learned from a rainstorm. When meeting with a sudden shower, you try not to get wet and run quickly along the road. But doing such things as passing under the eaves of houses, you still get wet. When you are resolved from the beginning, you will not be perplexed, though you will still get the same soaking. This understanding extends to everything…”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SheaMMd8H5g

FAIR USE: CRITICISM – As described by another character in the film: “That’s all it takes, really; pressure, and time.” As portrayed (very well) by the character of Andy Dufresne.

For Prospective New Players – A Useful Guide

A short list of things NOT to say on TI:Legacy, cuz they might think you’re me: (SATIRE…SATIRE…SATIRE)

:)
Hi
Hello
Hi :)
Hello :)
Thanks :)
Thanks! :)
Thank you!
Thank you
Thank you :)
Ok thanks!
Ok thanks
Ok thanks :)
Ok thank you
Ok thank you!
Ok thank you :)
Great RP :)
Great RP!
Thanks for the help.
Thanks for the help :)
Thanks for the help!
Thanks for the help! :)

And a quick tip:

If I can play a half-mage/half-demon for 56+ hours and all I get is an escort to make sure I don’t make any mistakes…try a mage. The current Order/Inquisition system is so incompetent (IMPO) that, if you’re at least mildly competent, you should be fine.

The Inquisition: Legacy MUD (Take Two)*

Mostly the same as take one (mostly nice, helpful imms and mostly nice, helpful players) but here’s one glaring exception to watch for:

The Inquisition: Legacy froze on me, so I had to re-logon. Four times, maybe five. In a row. It took a while. At very bad points. So I asked an Imm for help, because I NEEDED IT. And I was very polite and thankful, and they were nice at first (Thank you Mika).

Enter Azarial.

The tender-hearted, who asks questions as statements and ONLY answers code-related questions. Well, when he/she wants to.

“Azarial tells you, “Now. what is wrong with your pet”

Azarial replies to you, “What is wrong with it.”

(visnet) Staff Azarial: Ftr, misplaced pets are not a request for staff. use ‘hail lost’. if it is no longer on the ‘hail list’, that is a request/

(visnet) Player Abril: My pet was not misplaced. I was booted out of my room when the game crashed.

(visnet) Staff Azarial: That counts as misplaced.

(visnet) Player Abril: So a crash costs 50 silver?

Rule Quote: “Hail lost will summon lost pets for 50 silver.”

You tell Azarial, “Just so I’m clear on this…if the game crashes, I have to pay 50 silver to get my NPC back?”

…”This is a joke, right?”…

(visnet) Player Abril: Hey Azarial…can I ask you just one question?

“(visnet) Player Abril: Or do I have to send code questions in notes like Rimilde, even though your title says “can only answer code questions”?

(visnet) Player Abril: Azarial, if you don’t serve the purpose you state, what exactly do you do?”

I don’t recall EXACTLY, but here is my best recollection of another event, concerning Rimilde and Azarial: can only answer code questions (On visnet)-

Rimilde: I have a code question if I could please ask?

Azarial: You can ask it here unless it’s personal.

Rimilde: Well it is personal, that’s why I can’t…should I send a note?

Azarial: Yeah, probably best.

Nice answer.

If you have to send a note to ask a code question…why does it say “can only answer code questions” in your title, Az?

I mean, are you stating what your brain is theoretically capable of? Because since you didn’t answer that question, it seems to not be a “I WILL answer code questions” reference. Can you do anything else? Walk? Drool?

*= SATIRE…SATIRE…SATIRE. What am I mocking in the hope of provoking or preventing change, often using humor? Sh1tty Imming. That’s just IMPO, of course.

Something 999 People Out Of A Thousand Can’t Say (No Matter What The Storybooks Say)

“Deacon: So what is it, then? It’s the map.

Mariner: She’s my friend.

Deacon: Golly gee, a single tear rolls down my cheek. You’re gonna die for your friend.

Mariner: If it comes to that.

[He ignites the flare, and holds it over the hole again]

Nord: He’s bluffing! I’ll kill him.

Enola: He’s not bluffing, he never bluffs.

Deacon: SHUT UP!

[to the Mariner]

Deacon: I-I-I-I-I don’t think you’re gonna drop that torch, my friend.

Mariner: Why not?

Deacon: Because you’re not crazy.

[the Mariner smiles, lifts his hand, and drops the flare down the hole]” – WaterWorld

Roleplayers – The Conveniently-Logs-Off-Whenever-Any-Unpleasant-RP-Might-Occur-Or-Just-Cuz

This category is for players who (regardless of actual roleplay ability) tend to consistently lose link, go afk, “vanish”, quit…whenever the roleplay situation turns into something they don’t like, OOC.

Basically, they stop playing even when it’s utterly out of CHARACTER’s character to stop, because they (player) just don’t want to for one reason or another, IMPO.

1) Coralinna Wright (Burning Post II)

Roleplayers – The Irrepressibly Drab And Awful

1) Gwain (Forgotten Kingdoms) – Now, based on roleplay he would just qualify as Really Bad…but based on OOC used IC, anachronisms used IC, vastly superior standing compared to what he deserves, etc, etc, etc…he belongs here.
2) Elsbeth Winterfield (Burning Post II) – Tiny says, tiny emotes, BAD emotes, no personality whatsoever, undependable IC and OOC…I honestly can’t think of anything good about this character, besides the fact that she is so easily ignored…thank God.

Roleplayers – The Good

1) Most of the characters I’ve played :)
2) Luca aka Lucky (Burning Post II)
3) Liric Alycari (Forgotten Kingdoms) – In a sea of mostly well-meaning mediocre-to-pretty-good, his ‘good’-to-‘great’ stands out.
4) Cahir Kerrigan (Forgotten Kingdoms) – Pretty good-to-good.
5) Ariel le Orban (The Inquisition: Legacy) – Emotes are solid and efficient without being just-for-show long, character is defined.
6) Karston ab Broderick (The Inquisition: Legacy) – Pretty good-to-good.
7) Orlando op Cavallari (The Inquisition: Legacy) – Good, and I’m glad I was able to get the name since I only vaguely recalled it.

Roleplayers – A Thrusting Probe

This is to explain some upcoming entries on different roleplayers out there.

Roleplayers will be listed by character, not person, since I don’t know the people and since a person can sometimes have more than one character.

All information given will be MY PERSONAL SUBJECTIVE OPINION AND/OR SATIRE.

All noted comments and specifics (actions, mistakes, reactions from other players…) will be accurate to the best of my ability

The change I hope to provoke? Stopping sh1tty roleplay.

-Puppy >.< Yip!

Same-Day Edit: I have removed some categories and left the necessaries.

And if you enjoyed roleplaying with me, thank you.

Peace.

FAIR USE: CRITICISM – A meeting of two equals, portrayed well by both.

Film Imitates Hagakure – Part Eleven

“…Among the maxims on Lord Naoshige’s wall there was this one: ‘Matters of great concern should be treated lightly.’ Master Ittei commented, “Matters of small concern should be treated seriously.” Among one’s affairs there should not be more than two or three matters of what one could call great concern. If these are deliberated upon during ordinary times, they can be understood. Thinking about things previously and then handling them lightly when the time comes is what this is all about…”

FAIR USE: CRITICISM – A good example of the above, in film form.