A nice, silly way to relax your brain for 20,000 Leagues.
It’s really cheezy and dumb, but you might enjoy that, or enjoy laughing at it.
Or just watch the first locker scene from MIB2.
Grade: D-
A nice, silly way to relax your brain for 20,000 Leagues.
It’s really cheezy and dumb, but you might enjoy that, or enjoy laughing at it.
Or just watch the first locker scene from MIB2.
Grade: D-
My site’s been pretty darn still (there, it moved!) for a while now. And the way I determine that is: I don’t post much at all.
Now, popularity-wise, I’m pretty sure it’s maintained the standards set forth by me when I posted the critical masterpiece ‘Equilibrium’. Of course, it would take a Patrick Batemanian view to properly, monotonely settle that issue with certainty. Yes, it would!
I think a random group of four would probably offer this sort of view:
Results: Inconclusive.
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – For a group sketch in which only one person makes any attempt at speech or movement, not bad at all.
I’d like to be one of the following:
– happy and without any mental illness
– completely insane in such a way that I’m content with how things appear to be, to me
– completely insane in such a way that I get fan mail from fcken weirdos
– a newborn baby
– an old man about to die
– living alone away from everything else with an awesome (though admittedly not BEST, RIP Duchess) dog
– A vampire, werewolf or some fantasy sh1t along those lines
– Member of some group that loves me, that I love, and that does good
– a magician
– painlessly dead and in the Great Unknown
Any of those would be great.
Interested? Just make a comment on this. Thanx bunches.
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – The above two clips are just as the post title says. Much better than standard BS PR, I think at least. She seems candid, she seems to herself feel some part of the character she’s playing, and they’re fairly interesting.
There’s one feeling/emotion that’s very difficult to experience, both in terms of actually finding oneself in an appropriate situation and in terms of the resulting brief lack of functionality.
It’s beyond despair and above hatred…it’s more akin to incredulous disbelief: How could you possibly do something so vile? How could you, WHY would you rip out my heart like that?
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good scene from a great movie. Robert the Bruce never actually DID that, but it’s a good scene nonetheless.
You most certainly CAN win a game of Tic-Tac-Toe. But why the fck would you play the game when ANY other game would be more interesting?
Unless you’re prepping for surgery, of course.
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Great scene. I did live through the end of the Cold War, after all.
As far as the Stooges go, well let’s just say that they were plucky little fellows.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTIB10eQnA0
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Powerful song too often forgotten.
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Great scene from a not-quite-as-great movie.
Borrowed Guest Quote: “…you think no one will ever work a change on again until the next time it happens, whereupon you wonder why there isn’t loads more. It seems so simple.” – R. Christgau
I like the music I like.
You like the music you like.
Everyone likes the music they like.
The point is, EVERYONE likes music. Of some sort. Even just chiming in while someone else does karaoke.
And, given that, I find it difficult to simply let a (good) song disappear…which this one is (or seems to be) doing.
Heck I tried to buy the d@mn thing, no sh1t.
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good song, decent album…tell your friends.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeRghYqi090
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Don’t care much for the movie, but this scene is pretty darn cool. Perfect “backstory” for the character that would eventually emerge. You see, establishing a BACKGROUND (realistic, that is) is a good thing. It’s not as necessary as establishing a character who goes through at least MILD changes in likes/dislikes/personality quirks in 50 years, but it’s up there.
A tiny bit more risky/impulsive than Anakin in Episode One. And he turned out quite different, in a good way.
It takes effort.
“Alright…we’ll take the girl if you take Frasier.”
Lots of creepy images and scenes. Somewhat predictable. Actually VERY predictable, if you just go by the scary music warnings.
Not much character development.
BUT…the actors are decent enough. The idea isn’t exactly fresh and innovative…they seem to borrow a little here, a little there; stuff they liked, stuff they wanted to imitate, stuff they wanted to make their own…that’s my guess, at least.
So…predictably creepy, and interesting enough to give it a shot if you like that sort of thing.
ITMOM (Nice picture), ‘Night’ re-make uncle, ‘The Dead Zone’…you’ve seen some things before, but they’re not the WHOLE movie, so they’re kinda cool actually.
Zombieish, found footagey.
Inspirational Quote: “You should really let me go.”
Grade: D
If anyone ever asks you to play Russian Roulette, pause a moment, consider, and then counteroffer: “Best of three?”
*SATIRE…SATIRE…SATIRE*
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Great scene from a great movie.
Why watch something more than once?
Same reason you listen to music more than once.
Ever heard a song, thought/felt “that was amazing…”, and then just shrugged and didn’t try to hear it again, ever?
It’s good to be reminded every now and again that I don’t know sh1t about a LOT of things.
Nature knows no evil.
“At least I trusted you…whatever else I did wrong. I trusted you in the end.”
Gets off to a bit of a slow start, but then gets to her talent level fairly quickly.
Nice timing, some good jokes, some bad jokes, and LOTS of bad taste.
It just came to me: Sarah Silverman is Louis C.K.’s female understudy.
Clever girl.
Inspirational Quote: “I love them like my very own aborted fetuses.”
Grade: C+
Despite the 1-3 person drama (done tolerably well), this is a (tolerable) failure.
Because I don’t think it’s good enough to “believe” in the characters.
Because this is a zombie movie where the only echoes of zombie danger until about 20 minutes left are some weird screams (always in the background).
Only in the end does it get truly dramatic.
Stephen Donaldson, give me strength.
Grade: D-
I couldn’t say yes but I wouldn’t say no. Would I say maybe? I MIGHT…
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – The intermittent chats between Robert and his father were very interesting. This is one example (from ‘Braveheart’).
Ruff!
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Silly album cover, decent album, really cool song.
I actually was gonna make a point with visual aids about how Johnny Ringo acts cowardly in ‘Tombstone’. But silly me, I overlooked a MUCH more obvious choice: Ike Clanton.
Ike Clanton takes every chance he can get to PUSH the other side (the Earps, Holiday), but in the end, in the MOMENT (see…some moments have more importance than others…that’s why you have to live in them: you never know when a nothing moment will turn into a much more important moment), he runs away, leaving his younger brother Billy (who by all acounts fought valiantly) to die.
If you push, if you keep pushing, you better be ready for a push back. And that’s the moment of truth: Are you a coward, or aren’t you?
Of course, most people/times/occasions/etc that bluster collapse when their bluff is called. BUT…there is always the smallest chance that you’ll find someone who is NOT bluffing. And THAT (the odds) is the ONLY thing that keeps wannabes in business.
I guess the world needs ’em, huh?
Great odds they won’t call…but IF…IF they do, you better be better than Ringo vs. Holiday.
I still think that, as adapted movie warnings go, this is pretty d@mn good:
“If you ever X, I’ll make John Doe’s “SLOTH” look supremely merciful in comparison.”
Course, that’s just BS from me. But it makes a somewhat interesting reference.
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Great clip from an underrated movie.
SPOILER: ENDINGS (Two of ’em! THINK OF IT!)
I would think it’d be pretty d@mn hard to find two more disparate “characters” that both, nevertheless, share the same cardinal virtue.
(0:33-1:20)
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – A good clip from an otherwise fairly meh movie.
(0:00-1:57)
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Good clip from a very good movie.
If time travel was actually possible, anyone with access would be playing three-dimensional chess to the rest of the world’s Tic-Tac-Toe.
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Really good clip from a really good movie.
Awoooooooooooooooo!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnNWUUZ7cEA
Fair Use: Criticism – Sorry the video is so stupid.
Review: The video is stupid, cool song.
I wish I was just a little bit more fcked up or a whole lot less.
Fcking no man’s land is no place to live.
FAIR USE: CRITICISM – Great clip from a great movie.
HERE’S something not to do:
Manage to acquire some sort of business, make it really really suck, then have two friends come in during peak hours. Wait for any sort of complaint from any customer, and then…
(Friend One) :Speaking up as they stand, as if to corroborate the complaint, and saying the long insult by the Waldorf Salad guy altered as necessary, but clearly on the complainer’s side:
THEN, very quickly, friend two stands as if deeply offended, speaking up as the Major did in the Waldorf Salad episode of ‘Fawlty Towers’, and making his punchline be another crummy business that does what yours does but is even WORSE.
It’s so simple it’s BRILLIANT.
James Tiberius Kirk handled it very well, of course…but I think there’s another scenario response that ought to be tried. You’ll still LOSE, of course…but you lose in STYLE, baby.
*Kobayashi Maru Commander* “This is the Kobayashi Maru…we have struck a-”
*Cadet, Interrupting* “Yeah, I know. Look, here’s an idea ladies and germs – next time your navigations officer or whatever-spacial-dangers officer says ‘Captain…we appear to be headed toward some sort of mine’, DON’T say “Ehhh…keep going”.
OR…
*Kobayashi Maru Commander* “Steady on course, helmsman.”
*Helmsman* “Ummm…begging the Captain’s pardon, but this is the area that has contained a mine each of the past 237 times we’ve entered it. Maybe we should just hook a right, or something?”
New movie ‘Valerian’ coming soon.
Well, no idea if it’s any good, but it’s definitely about d@mn time someone made a ‘Space Mutiny’ prequel.
The great thing about Norm’s act/performing style is that it will go completely unnoticed when he finally goes senile and starts just rambling incoherently, without timing or interest in whether people can understand or not.
I’m sick of calling his attitude “brave”. It’s just fcken smug-a$$ dull by this point. If a bit of good humor comes out now and again, credit the law of averages.
Grade: D-
“Dreaming…dreaming is free.”
*thoughts, feelings, incidentals*
If you need to know more you won’t like it.
Grade: B-
‘Semper Puppy’ Update: R.I.P.
LCL: No Change.
Movies: MORE TO COME!
Grade For My Grade-Giving/Reviews: Sometimes they suck, but usually there’s SOME bit of interest in them, at least. And occasionally I pull some great inspiration from out of nowhere. That’s for you Mortone!
Louis C.K. – If you find a clip you haven’t seen, give it a watch. Never bad. His specials are probably his best (I haven’t seen EVERY C.K. bit) but there’s small bits of inspired tastelessness out there all over the place. That’s a Bingo!
You know the story, of course. So the question is “how well will they tell it?”
This particular version has impressive performances by the female lead and Ben Kingsley.
The other characters seem peripheral – not bad, but not really good…”capable”.
It’s a little bit too teen-angst/cliche for me at parts in the beginning, but overall this is a pretty good movie. Nowhere near the power of ‘Schindler’s List’, but something I think should at least be given a chance.
Builds somewhat slowly after the capture – shows the gradual loss of anything that even resembles humane treatment.
Grade: C+
What I remembered: Well-made enough, a bit macho, fairly interesting, not interesting enough to compel viewing but enough to warrant a look-see, too much flashbacking.
Confirmed.
Has a bit of a Dreckheimer feel about it…but Denzel and (usually) the plot are enough to get by that.
Grade: C
To the current “official” holder of LCL supremacy…”well you’re pretty good, old son, but sit down in that chair right there and let me show you how it’s done.”
Lost City Lanes (Real) High Score: 2813, by me.
My All-Time High Score: 2813 (Actually higher, but let’s start from this).
Last Updated: 5/4/17
Ignore the title. Ignore the description. Hell, ignore the movie.
Tired of creating innovative and interesting series, NF apparently decided to momentarily rest on their laurels and give us this movie-long hunk of total sh1t.
It’s not NEARLY as “menacing” as the title and description make it seem. That’s just BS advertising.
Of course, since it’s really stupid BUT well-written enough and well-acted enough to be convincing in its stupidity, this will be seen by some as a marvelous accomplishment; a prodigious achievement.
You said it, it’s putrid.
Upgrade to an A if you thought ‘The Big Lebowski’ was brilliant cinema.
Grade: F
I’ve only watched two of them (One on suspense and ‘Inglourious Basterds’, the other on creepiness and ‘The Shining’) but from what I gather they’re well-made, well-researched, and interesting…the analysis is intelligent without being smug, sort of “I want to talk, right down to earth, in a language that everybody here, can easily understand”.
Recommendation: Watch the ‘Basterds’ one first. If you like it, give the ‘The Shining’ one a look-see, then maybe try some more if you’re impressed.
A documentary on how people lie, why, different circumstances, different perceptions, etc.
It’s a bit slow at first, and there are tedious moments.
However, the main speaker (who they cut to frequently) is both interesting and somewhat amusing.
And the overall interest factor in learning about the subject should keep your attention for the most part.
Grade: C+
Australia Australia Australia!
Python comparison: None, nowhere near as good.
KITH comparison: Pretty close at times, but not quite.
Best Guess Reference: ‘The Vacant Lot’.
Basically it’s a sketch comedy show/series that sometimes has themes reappearing later in each episode.
I can’t see hating it, nor can I see loving it. But it is quite tasteless, while at the same time being moderately amusing/entertaining.
Mildly recommended to fans of KITH, TVL, and general tasteless comedy.
Unfunny bordering on embarrassing.
I was worried it might be this bad, and it is. I only have one episode to work with, because I refuse to waste more time on this when I can be wasting it somewhere else.
At no point do I get the feeling of “hey, that was inspired” or “hey, nice message in joke form”.
By now there are so many people doing this sort of thing that it’s just another failed re-creation.
Let it go, guys.
Inspirational Quote from a long-ago MST3K sketch: “It stinks.”
It’s about people with major physical deformities: how they act, how they’re treated by “normal” people, how they feel about themselves, and their various friends/family.
Some of the visuals are disturbing, and parts of the movie are disturbing.
A bit difficult to grade…the makeup is very convincing, the characters seem real enough, and its message is at heart positive, about such people and the things they have to endure…AND about how they’re almost invariably better people than the ones that look “normal”.
But I think the idea of it could have been realized a lot better than it was.
If it sounds interesting, try the beginning, and go from there.
Grade: D
Ha ha. Kangaroo Court. Ha ha.
Having established and accepted that his films suck, I thought I’d try to just summarize David Lynch for people who may be a bit confused.
Lynch is a writer/director whose “talents” are in the “director” part.
I mean, it’s got mood (LOTS of it), it’s got slowwwww building sequences, it’s got weird images, it’s got too many eyeball closeups, it’s got 1 minute scenes stretched out to 5 by means of standing/sitting around doing nothing, and it’s got a script that some may consider brilliant but that is, in reality, sh1t.
I mean, hell, even Ed Wood wrote better lines than this.
So unbelievable, so cold, so NON-reality-escaping.
So PLEASE-don’t-take-me-to-this-fantasy-world-for-two-hours-and-change.
I mean, the dialogue is mediocre at best. And the delivery is like a cross between Flying Circus’s ‘The Free Repetition Of Doubtful Words Thing’ and Ed Wood’s old buddy Kline.
It’s not dream-like unless your dreams are stupid and pretentious at the same time.
Horrible movie.
Grade: F
An eerie doctor does some eerie tests on some eerie patients in an eerie hospital.
I was going to dismiss this as yet another totally cliche, predictable “horror” movie that loves sudden, SCARY music and actions. And doesn’t bother too much with acting.
But there was something about it (maybe the other second-banana nurse looking GREAT in her uniform, RAWR) that intrigued me just enough to keep watching. And by then, it wasn’t a film, it was a meal.
The creepy moments are there, so if you’re desperate for a horror/”thriller” movie, you MIGHT find this of some interest. But don’t be desperate, watch something else.
The ending sucks, if you like that sort of thing
Inspirational Quote: “My strengths are…bodily fluids and spongebaths.”
Premature IQ: “I’m okay.”
Grade: D-
Why is Elliot dressed as Captain Jean-Luc Picard in the ripoff – I MEAN GREAT GIVEAWAY – ad for Jordan’s Furniture?
This is INCREDIBLY silly.
Pay no attention to the back story, or the main story.
Just watch as some guy battles rogue arcade games, Der Fuhrer and other nasty foes.
Personally, I find it stupid enough to be amusing at times. Other times, just stupid.
But it’s short…if you like sh1tty movies, why not give this sh1tty short film a try?
Grade explanation: Not quite top-shelf enough to qualify for a sh1t-C.
Inspirational Quote: “Knuck-les.”
Grade: D-
Watch out for Snake!
Just as cheezy as I remembered/feared.
Mediocre everything, not-even-that dialogue.
There’s a minor interest in terms of the “idea”, but this is a pretty bad film.
Grade: D-
A little boring in parts, a little creepy in parts.
Things seem to fail more often than not, and even when they “work” you wonder how long a couple that met maybe three times before getting married will stay together.
Moral of the story, IMPO: It ain’t worth it.
It’s a tolerable watch, but nothing all that good.
Grade: D
Amy talks about sex n’ stuff for a while.
Monumental letdown after Louis C.K. – she’s not that funny, and her serious commentary is generic at best.
Grade: D
Louis’s still got his edge; I was worried.
If you don’t like edgy/tasteless, stay away.
There are a few bits that miss but overall it’s good, clever, and utterly tasteless.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen him more tasteless, actually. I chalk it up to two things…just guesses, but here they are:
1) He’s pissed off and bitter.
2) He’s pushing as far as he can while still making people laugh; it’s sort of like this is Louis’s version of Chapman/Cleese saying “Let’s see how offensive we can be…I mean, let’s PUSH IT” via the ‘Undertaker Sketch’.
Best bits:
Baby killing rant
Anti-Love rant
Elegant fingering
Dick sniffing
Grade: B
Updated:
Night Of The Living Deb
Speaking of serial killer fascination…
Lilith sums up sociopaths and why rebound-dating is bad:
“So, essentially, Frasier was a toy you played with briefly and then threw away; a fellow human being whose emotions you twisted for your own satisfaction, with no consideration for his feelings.”